Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Zur Aktuellen Deutschen Diskussion um die Evidenz-basierte Medizin: Brennpunkte, Skotome, Divergierende Wertsetzungen

Translated title of the contribution: The Current Evidence-based Medicine Debate in Germany: Focal Points, Scotoma and Diverging Values

Heiner Raspe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

In Germany evidence-based medicine has gained momentum not before the mid-1990ies. In particular, it started its career in the form of evidence-based health care. Within a few years (1999) the term even became part of Germany's social law. In contrast, clinicians and representatives of medical organisations are still sceptical and reluctant to adopt its concept, methods, and techniques. In part, their critical attitudes have been focusing on the perceived "deprofessionalisation" of the medical profession. Based on sociological and historical arguments and in view of the recently published "Charter on Medical Professionalism", the present paper reports and analyses this criticism. EbM, as an instrument of intraprofessional regulation, will most probably contribute to strengthening the autonomy of the medical profession; this, however, does not preclude the possibility that EbM may restrict the professional autonomy of individual physicians.

Translated title of the contributionThe Current Evidence-based Medicine Debate in Germany: Focal Points, Scotoma and Diverging Values
Original languageGerman
JournalZeitschrift fur Arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung
Volume97
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)689-694
Number of pages6
ISSN1431-7621
Publication statusPublished - 12.2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Current Evidence-based Medicine Debate in Germany: Focal Points, Scotoma and Diverging Values'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this