Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Matthias May; Michael Rink; Axel S. Merseburger; Sabine D. Brookman-May

doi:10.21037/tau-20-1152

Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Matthias May^*, Michael Rink, Axel S. Merseburger, Sabine D. Brookman-May

^*Corresponding author for this work

Clinic of Urology

Original language	English
Journal	Translational Andrology and Urology
Volume	9
Issue number	5
Pages (from-to)	1901-1903
Number of pages	3
ISSN	2223-4683
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1152
Publication status	Published - 10.2020

Research Areas and Centers

Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.21037/tau-20-1152

Cite this

@article{01a1689cd50947fd9e5ee595971e8b4c,

title = "Why is the principle of “as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible” only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?",

author = "Matthias May and Michael Rink and Merseburger, {Axel S.} and Brookman-May, {Sabine D.}",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

doi = "10.21037/tau-20-1152",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "1901--1903",

journal = "Translational Andrology and Urology",

issn = "2223-4683",

number = "5",