Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt*, Joaquim Radua, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

Original languageEnglish
Article number46
JournalBehavioral and Brain Functions
Volume8
ISSN1744-9081
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this