Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

Stefan Borgwardt*, Joaquim Radua, Andrea Mechelli, Paolo Fusar-Poli

*Corresponding author for this work
26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience.

Original languageEnglish
Article number46
JournalBehavioral and Brain Functions
Volume8
ISSN1744-9081
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.09.2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this