TY - JOUR
T1 - Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases: Does the interval between imaging and treatment matter?
AU - Hansen, Heinke C.
AU - Janssen, Stefan
AU - Thieme, Cathrin
AU - Perlov, Aleksej
AU - Schild, Steven E.
AU - Rades, Dirk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Background/Aim: Many patients with brain metastases receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). An important question is whether a delay between diagnosis of brain metastases and treatment impairs the patient’s prognosis. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the impact of the interval between diagnosis of brain metastases and WBRT plus ten additional factors on overall survival (OS) in 573 patients. Prospective trials cannot be performed due to ethical concerns. Results: On univariate analyses, age (p<0.001), performance status (p<0.001), controlled primary tumor (p=0.047), metastases outside the brain (p<0.001) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) were associated with OS. The interval between diagnosis and WBRT had no significant impact (p=0.84). On multivariate analysis, age (p=0.047), performance status (p<0.001), metastases outside the brain (p=0.029) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) maintained significance. Conclusion: WBRT may be postponed for good reasons (multidisciplinary coordination of treatment, missing histology). OS was significantly associated with previously identified factors, which demonstrates consistency of the present data.
AB - Background/Aim: Many patients with brain metastases receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). An important question is whether a delay between diagnosis of brain metastases and treatment impairs the patient’s prognosis. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the impact of the interval between diagnosis of brain metastases and WBRT plus ten additional factors on overall survival (OS) in 573 patients. Prospective trials cannot be performed due to ethical concerns. Results: On univariate analyses, age (p<0.001), performance status (p<0.001), controlled primary tumor (p=0.047), metastases outside the brain (p<0.001) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) were associated with OS. The interval between diagnosis and WBRT had no significant impact (p=0.84). On multivariate analysis, age (p=0.047), performance status (p<0.001), metastases outside the brain (p=0.029) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) maintained significance. Conclusion: WBRT may be postponed for good reasons (multidisciplinary coordination of treatment, missing histology). OS was significantly associated with previously identified factors, which demonstrates consistency of the present data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057570282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21873/anticanres.13057
DO - 10.21873/anticanres.13057
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30504398
AN - SCOPUS:85057570282
SN - 0250-7005
VL - 38
SP - 6835
EP - 6840
JO - Anticancer Research
JF - Anticancer Research
IS - 12
ER -