Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases: Does the interval between imaging and treatment matter?

Heinke C. Hansen, Stefan Janssen, Cathrin Thieme, Aleksej Perlov, Steven E. Schild, Dirk Rades*

*Corresponding author for this work
3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aim: Many patients with brain metastases receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). An important question is whether a delay between diagnosis of brain metastases and treatment impairs the patient’s prognosis. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the impact of the interval between diagnosis of brain metastases and WBRT plus ten additional factors on overall survival (OS) in 573 patients. Prospective trials cannot be performed due to ethical concerns. Results: On univariate analyses, age (p<0.001), performance status (p<0.001), controlled primary tumor (p=0.047), metastases outside the brain (p<0.001) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) were associated with OS. The interval between diagnosis and WBRT had no significant impact (p=0.84). On multivariate analysis, age (p=0.047), performance status (p<0.001), metastases outside the brain (p=0.029) and completion of WBRT (p<0.001) maintained significance. Conclusion: WBRT may be postponed for good reasons (multidisciplinary coordination of treatment, missing histology). OS was significantly associated with previously identified factors, which demonstrates consistency of the present data.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnticancer Research
Volume38
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)6835-6840
Number of pages6
ISSN0250-7005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12.2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases: Does the interval between imaging and treatment matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this