TY - JOUR
T1 - Whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT + SRS) versus surgery plus whole brain radiotherapy (OP + WBRT) for 1-3 brain metastases: Results of a matched pair analysis
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Kueter, Jan Dirk
AU - Veninga, Theo
AU - Gliemroth, Jan
AU - Schild, Steven E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - This study is the first one to compare WBRT + SRS to OP + WBRT for 1-3 brain metastases. Survival (OS), intracerebral control (IC) and local control (LC) of the treated metastases were retrospectively evaluated in 52 patients undergoing WBRT + SRS and in 52 patients undergoing OP + WBRT. Both groups were matched for WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumour, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, RPA class and interval from tumour diagnosis to WBRT. One-year OS was 56% after WBRT + SRS and 47% after OP + WBRT (p = 0.034). One-year IC was 66% and 50% (p = 0.003). One-year LC was 82% and 66% (p = 0.006). On multivariate analyses, it was found that improved OS was associated with younger age (p = 0.044), no extracerebral metastases (p < 0.001), RPA class 1 (p < 0.001) and longer interval from tumour diagnosis to WBRT (p = 0.001). IC was associated with younger age (p = 0.002) and longer interval (p = 0.004); WBRT + SRS achieved borderline significance (p = 0.052). Improved LC was associated with longer interval (p = 0.017); WBRT + SRS showed a trend (p = 0.09). WBRT + SRS appears at least as effective as OP + WBRT.
AB - This study is the first one to compare WBRT + SRS to OP + WBRT for 1-3 brain metastases. Survival (OS), intracerebral control (IC) and local control (LC) of the treated metastases were retrospectively evaluated in 52 patients undergoing WBRT + SRS and in 52 patients undergoing OP + WBRT. Both groups were matched for WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumour, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, RPA class and interval from tumour diagnosis to WBRT. One-year OS was 56% after WBRT + SRS and 47% after OP + WBRT (p = 0.034). One-year IC was 66% and 50% (p = 0.003). One-year LC was 82% and 66% (p = 0.006). On multivariate analyses, it was found that improved OS was associated with younger age (p = 0.044), no extracerebral metastases (p < 0.001), RPA class 1 (p < 0.001) and longer interval from tumour diagnosis to WBRT (p = 0.001). IC was associated with younger age (p = 0.002) and longer interval (p = 0.004); WBRT + SRS achieved borderline significance (p = 0.052). Improved LC was associated with longer interval (p = 0.017); WBRT + SRS showed a trend (p = 0.09). WBRT + SRS appears at least as effective as OP + WBRT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59149107419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.033
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 19062269
AN - SCOPUS:59149107419
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 45
SP - 400
EP - 404
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 3
ER -