TY - JOUR
T1 - Vorhersage von Psychosen durch stufenweise Mehrebenenabklärung - Das Basler FePsy(Früherkennung von Psychosen)-Projekt
AU - Riecher-Rössler, A.
AU - Aston, J.
AU - Borgwardt, S.
AU - Bugra, H.
AU - Fuhr, P.
AU - Gschwandtner, U.
AU - Koutsouleris, N.
AU - Pflueger, M.
AU - Tamagni, C.
AU - Radü, E. W.
AU - Rapp, C.
AU - Smieskova, R.
AU - Studerus, E.
AU - Walter, A.
AU - Zimmermann, R.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background: We have conducted various studies in Basel with the aim of improving the methods for the early detection of psychosis (Früherkennung von Psychosen, FePsy). Methods: From 1.3.2000 to 29.2.2004 234 individuals were screened using the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP). 106 patients were identified as at risk for psychosis; out of these 53 remained in follow-up for up to 7 years (mean 5.4 years). The assessments were done with a specifically developed instrument for history taking, various scales for the psychopathology, assessments of neuropsychology and fine motor functioning, clinical and quantitative EEG, MRI of the brain, laboratory etc. Results: Based on the BSIP alone, a relatively reliable prediction was possible: 21 (39.6 %) of the individuals identified as at risk developed psychosis within the follow-up time. Post-hoc prediction could be improved to 81 % by weighting psychopathology and including neuropsychology. Including the other domains obviously allows further improvements of prediction. Conclusions: The risk for psychosis should be assessed in a stepwise procedure. In a first step, a clinically oriented screening should be conducted. If an at-risk status is found, further assessments in various domains should be done in a specialised centre.
AB - Background: We have conducted various studies in Basel with the aim of improving the methods for the early detection of psychosis (Früherkennung von Psychosen, FePsy). Methods: From 1.3.2000 to 29.2.2004 234 individuals were screened using the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP). 106 patients were identified as at risk for psychosis; out of these 53 remained in follow-up for up to 7 years (mean 5.4 years). The assessments were done with a specifically developed instrument for history taking, various scales for the psychopathology, assessments of neuropsychology and fine motor functioning, clinical and quantitative EEG, MRI of the brain, laboratory etc. Results: Based on the BSIP alone, a relatively reliable prediction was possible: 21 (39.6 %) of the individuals identified as at risk developed psychosis within the follow-up time. Post-hoc prediction could be improved to 81 % by weighting psychopathology and including neuropsychology. Including the other domains obviously allows further improvements of prediction. Conclusions: The risk for psychosis should be assessed in a stepwise procedure. In a first step, a clinically oriented screening should be conducted. If an at-risk status is found, further assessments in various domains should be done in a specialised centre.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878101568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1335017
DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1335017
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
C2 - 23695791
AN - SCOPUS:84878101568
SN - 0720-4299
VL - 81
SP - 265
EP - 275
JO - Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie
JF - Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie
IS - 5
ER -