TY - JOUR
T1 - Versorgung der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz - eine systematische Leitliniensynopse im Rahmen der geplanten DMP-Aktualisierung
AU - Kötter, Thomas
AU - Bartel, Carmen
AU - Schramm, Susanne
AU - Lange, Petra
AU - Höfer, Eva
AU - Hänsel, Michaela
AU - Waffenschmidt, Siw
AU - Waldt, Susanne Ein
AU - Hoffmann-Eßer, Wiebke
AU - Rüther, Alric
AU - Lühmann, Dagmar
AU - Scherer, Martin
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background Disease Management Programmes (DMPs) are structured treatment programmes for chronic diseases. The DMP requirements are primarily derived from evidence-based guidelines. DMPs are regularly revised to ensure that they reflect current best practice and medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to assess the need for updating the German DMP module on heart failure by comparing it to relevant guidelines and identifying recommendations that should be revised. Methods We systematically searched for clinical guidelines on heart failure published in German, English or French, and extracted relevant guideline recommendations. All included guidelines were assessed for methodological quality. To identify revision needs in the DMP, we performed a synoptic analysis of the extracted guideline recommendations and DMP requirements. Results 27 guidelines were included. The extracted recommendations covered all aspects of the management of heart failure. The comparison of guideline recommendations with DMP requirements showed that, overall, guideline recommendations were more detailed than DMP requirements, and that the guidelines covered topics not included in the DMP module. Conclusions The DMP module is largely consistent with current guidelines on heart failure. We did not identify any need for significant revision of the DMP requirements. However, some specific recommendations of the DMP module could benefit from revision.
AB - Background Disease Management Programmes (DMPs) are structured treatment programmes for chronic diseases. The DMP requirements are primarily derived from evidence-based guidelines. DMPs are regularly revised to ensure that they reflect current best practice and medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to assess the need for updating the German DMP module on heart failure by comparing it to relevant guidelines and identifying recommendations that should be revised. Methods We systematically searched for clinical guidelines on heart failure published in German, English or French, and extracted relevant guideline recommendations. All included guidelines were assessed for methodological quality. To identify revision needs in the DMP, we performed a synoptic analysis of the extracted guideline recommendations and DMP requirements. Results 27 guidelines were included. The extracted recommendations covered all aspects of the management of heart failure. The comparison of guideline recommendations with DMP requirements showed that, overall, guideline recommendations were more detailed than DMP requirements, and that the guidelines covered topics not included in the DMP module. Conclusions The DMP module is largely consistent with current guidelines on heart failure. We did not identify any need for significant revision of the DMP requirements. However, some specific recommendations of the DMP module could benefit from revision.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888291805&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.03.016
DO - 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.03.016
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
C2 - 24238027
AN - SCOPUS:84888291805
SN - 1865-9217
VL - 107
SP - 490
EP - 499
JO - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
JF - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
IS - 7
ER -