Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of clinical ratings of cervical dystonia using computer-generated avatars

Sebastian Loens, Roland Stenger, Feline Hamami, Alexander Münchau, Theresa Paulus, Anne Weissbach, Gesine M Sallandt, Tatiana Usnich, Max Borsche, Martje G Pauly, Lara M Lange, Markus A Hobert, Rebecca Herzog, Ana Luísa de Almeida Marcelino, Tina Mainka, Friederike Schumann, Lukas L Goede, Johanna Reimer, Kirsten E Zeuner, Julienne HaasJos Becktepe, Alexander Baumann, Robin Wolke, Chi Wang Ip, Thorsten Odorfer, Daniel Zeller, Lisa Harder-Rauschenberger, John-Ih Lee, Philipp Albrecht, Petyo Nikolov, Tristan Kölsche, Joachim K Krauss, Johanna M Nagel, Joachim Runge, Jessica Utermarck, Katja Kollewe, Johanna Doll-Lee, Johanne Heine, Linda Veith Sanches, Simone Zittel, Kai Grimm, Pawel Tacik, André Lee, Andrea Henze, Sebastian Fudickar, Tobias Bäumer

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Collum-Caput (Col-Cap) concept are tools for clinically assessing cervical dystonia severity. However, the accuracy of human ratings using these scales has not been systematically evaluated due to the lack of objective reference measurements. This study aims to assess and compare the accuracy of human TWSTRS and Col-Cap ratings to evaluate their robustness for clinical and research applications.

METHODS: One hundred pictures of 26 avatars mimicking cervical dystonia were created using the Rocketbox Avatar library. Forty-one movement disorder specialists rated the head and neck positioning of the avatars using either TWSTRS or Col-Cap. Movements were defined around two rotational levels (head, neck) in three rotational axes (pitch, yaw, roll).

RESULTS: Ratings of angular deviations showed a mean absolute error of 5.8° (SD = 7.0). Rating accuracy was primarily influenced by the magnitude of angular deviation, with larger angles leading to greater estimation errors. Direct comparison of the rating scales revealed a higher accuracy through Col-Cap ratings (71 % vs. 63 % for TWSTRS). Years of clinical experience did not significantly affect rating accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS: Both rating systems (TWSTRS and Col-Cap) show moderate accuracy in assessing head and neck positioning from computer-generated avatars, with Col-Cap showing slightly higher overall accuracy but struggling with precise differentiation between head and neck movements. These findings underscore the limitations of current clinical rating scales and highlight the need for more objective, reliable tools to effectively assess cervical dystonia.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107975
JournalParkinsonism and Related Disorders
Volume142
Pages (from-to)107975
ISSN1353-8020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
  • Research Area: Medical Genetics
  • Academic Focus: Biomedical Engineering

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.23-06 Molecular and Cellular Neurology and Neuropathology
  • 4.43-05 Image and Language Processing, Computer Graphics and Visualisation, Human Computer Interaction, Ubiquitous and Wearable Computing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of clinical ratings of cervical dystonia using computer-generated avatars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this