Abstract
This study evaluates user experiences with the social robot Pepper, compared to a traditional info terminal in providing citizen services. The study, carried out with 37 participants at various institutions in Lübeck, Germany, aims to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of these two methods in providing information and assistance within a public service setting. The study controls for age, gender, and affinity for technology while measuring customer experience using the Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). The results show that Pepper is attributed higher hedonistic qualities, whereas the terminal is highlighted as pragmatic and is overall preferred in the evaluated context. Further findings show that, while age and gender do have at least some explanatory power in explaining divergent user experiences, the affinity for technology interaction surprisingly did not seem to have an impact.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Publication date | 2025 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'User Experience Comparison of a Social Robot vs. Info Terminal in Citizen Services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver