Ulnaris- vs. Radialisunterarmlappen in der Rekonstruktion von Mundhöhle und Gesichtsregion.

P. Sieg

doi:10.1007/s100060050009

Ulnaris- vs. Radialisunterarmlappen in der Rekonstruktion von Mundhöhle und Gesichtsregion.

Translated title of the contribution: Ulnar versus radial forearm flap in orofacial reconstruction

P. Sieg^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The microvascular ulnar forearm flap is compared with the radial forearm flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck region. In 67 patients 44 ulnar forearm and 23 radial forearm flaps were applied. The two groups were compared regarding flap dissection, suitability of the flap for the recipient region, complication rate and secondary morbidity of the donor region. The ulnar forearm flap is favoured due to the less hairy skin of the ulnar forearm region and the more conveniently located donor area. The ulnar forearm flap pedicle is long compared with alternative transplants but shorter than the radial pendant.

Translated title of the contribution	Ulnar versus radial forearm flap in orofacial reconstruction
Original language	German
Journal	Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG
Volume	4
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	35-38
Number of pages	4
ISSN	1432-9417
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s100060050009
Publication status	Published - 01.2000

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1007/s100060050009

Cite this

@article{cfd2d48896a349248699ab4304d8cd5c,

title = "Ulnaris- vs. Radialisunterarmlappen in der Rekonstruktion von Mundh{\"o}hle und Gesichtsregion.",

abstract = "The microvascular ulnar forearm flap is compared with the radial forearm flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck region. In 67 patients 44 ulnar forearm and 23 radial forearm flaps were applied. The two groups were compared regarding flap dissection, suitability of the flap for the recipient region, complication rate and secondary morbidity of the donor region. The ulnar forearm flap is favoured due to the less hairy skin of the ulnar forearm region and the more conveniently located donor area. The ulnar forearm flap pedicle is long compared with alternative transplants but shorter than the radial pendant.",

author = "P. Sieg",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1007/s100060050009",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "4",

pages = "35--38",

journal = "Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG",

issn = "1432-9417",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ulnaris- vs. Radialisunterarmlappen in der Rekonstruktion von Mundhöhle und Gesichtsregion.

AU - Sieg, P.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - The microvascular ulnar forearm flap is compared with the radial forearm flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck region. In 67 patients 44 ulnar forearm and 23 radial forearm flaps were applied. The two groups were compared regarding flap dissection, suitability of the flap for the recipient region, complication rate and secondary morbidity of the donor region. The ulnar forearm flap is favoured due to the less hairy skin of the ulnar forearm region and the more conveniently located donor area. The ulnar forearm flap pedicle is long compared with alternative transplants but shorter than the radial pendant.

AB - The microvascular ulnar forearm flap is compared with the radial forearm flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck region. In 67 patients 44 ulnar forearm and 23 radial forearm flaps were applied. The two groups were compared regarding flap dissection, suitability of the flap for the recipient region, complication rate and secondary morbidity of the donor region. The ulnar forearm flap is favoured due to the less hairy skin of the ulnar forearm region and the more conveniently located donor area. The ulnar forearm flap pedicle is long compared with alternative transplants but shorter than the radial pendant.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033629993

U2 - 10.1007/s100060050009

DO - 10.1007/s100060050009

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

C2 - 10662918

AN - SCOPUS:0033629993

SN - 1432-9417

VL - 4

SP - 35

EP - 38

JO - Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG

JF - Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG

IS - 1

ER -

Ulnaris- vs. Radialisunterarmlappen in der Rekonstruktion von Mundhöhle und Gesichtsregion.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this