Background Rational healthcare decision-making based on clinical and economic evidence is essential to provide the best possible care for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective To evaluate treatment outcomes, resource use and cost associated with twice-weekly tacrolimus 0.03% ointment treatment vs. standard flare-only therapy in children with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods In a pan-European, Phase III multicentre randomized clinical trial, children with mild-to-severe AD were randomized to 0.03% tacrolimus ointment or vehicle twice weekly for 12 months. Disease flares were treated using open-label tacrolimus 0.03% ointment twice daily. Clinical efficacy data were evaluated in a subgroup of 153 children with moderate-to-severe AD, with resource use data - collected prospectively using caregiver questionnaires - available from 146 children. Pooled costs of resource use were determined using German unit cost data. Direct and indirect costs were considered from third-party payer, patient and caregiver, and societal perspectives. Results Twice-weekly tacrolimus ointment reduced the number of flares compared with standard therapy (P < 0.001) and prolonged time to first flare (146 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Mean ± SD annual costs per patient for standard and twice-weekly therapy respectively were €2002 ± 2315 vs. €1571 ± 1122 for severe AD and €1136 ± 1494 vs. €1233 ± 1507 for moderate AD. Conclusions In children with AD, twice-weekly treatment with tacrolimus 0.03% ointment reduces the number of flares and prolongs time spent free from flares with no additional cost in children with moderate AD, and may be cost-saving in those with severe AD.
|Journal||Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology|
|Number of pages||7|
|Publication status||Published - 09.2010|
Research Areas and Centers
- Academic Focus: Center for Infection and Inflammation Research (ZIEL)