Treatment costs for advanced prostate cancer using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: A solid biodegradable leuprorelin implant versus other formulations

Axel S. Merseburger, Thomas Björk, James Whitehouse, Davide Meani*

*Corresponding author for this work
8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To compare treatment costs with alternative luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist preparations and determine whether a leuprorelin solid implant is associated with potential cost savings. Patients & methods: A hypothetical population of 1000 prostate cancer patients was apportioned between the three most commonly-prescribed LHRH agonist preparations. Differentiated annual costs for 1- and 3-monthly formulations were calculated for France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK (EU5) and Sweden, and compared with the leuprorelin solid implant. Results: Compared with alternative formulations, leuprorelin solid implants had potential annual cost savings/1000 patients of €353,000 (EU5) and €699,000 (Sweden; 1-month formulations), and €259,000 (EU5) and €300,000 (Sweden; 3-month formulations). Conclusion: The leuprorelin solid implant was associated with potential cost savings compared with the most commonly used LHRH agonist preparations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume4
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)447-453
Number of pages7
ISSN2042-6305
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.2015

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment costs for advanced prostate cancer using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: A solid biodegradable leuprorelin implant versus other formulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this