Training, Research, and Working Conditions for Urology Residents in Germany: A Contemporary Survey

Hendrik Borgmann*, Hannah K. Arnold, Christian P. Meyer, Johannes Bründl, Justus König, Tim Nestler, Christian Ruf, Julian Struck, Johannes Salem

*Corresponding author for this work
11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Excellent uniform training of urology residents is crucial to secure both high-quality patient care and the future of our specialty. Residency training has come under scrutiny following the demands of subspecialized care, economical aspects, and working hour regulations. Objective: To comprehensively assess the surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions among urology residents in Germany. Design, setting, and participants: We sent a 29-item online survey via email to 721 members of the German Society of Residents in Urology. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Descriptive analyses were conducted to describe the surveys’ four domains: (1) baseline characteristics, (2) surgical training (cumulative completed case volume for all minor-, medium-, and major-complexity surgeries), (3) research opportunities, and (4) working conditions. Results and limitations: Four hundred and seventy-two residents completed the online survey (response rate 65%). Surgical training: the median number of cumulative completed cases for postgraduate yr (PGY)-5 residents was 113 (interquartile range: 76–178). Minor surgeries comprised 57% of all surgeries and were performed by residents in all PGYs. Medium-complexity surgeries comprised 39% of all surgeries and were mostly performed by residents in PGYs 2–5. Major surgeries comprised 4% of all surgeries and were occasionally performed by residents in PGYs 3–5. Research opportunities: some 44% have attained a medical thesis (Dr. med.), and 39% are currently pursuing research. Working conditions: psychosocial work-related stress was high and for 82% of residents their effort exceeded their rewards. Some 44% were satisfied, 32% were undecided, and 24% were dissatisfied with their current working situation. Limitations include self-reported survey answers and a lack of validated assessment tools. Conclusions: Surgical exposure among German urology residents is low and comprises minor and medium-complex surgeries. Psychosocial work-related stress is high for the vast majority of residents indicating the need for structural improvements in German urology residency training. Patient summary: In this study, we evaluated the surgical training, research opportunities, and working conditions among urology residents in Germany. We found low surgical exposure and high rates for psychosocial work-related stress, indicating the need for structural improvements in German urology residency training. Surgical exposure among German urology residents is low and residents experience high psychosocial work-related stress. These findings indicate the need for structural improvements in German urology residency training.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean urology focus
Volume4
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)455-460
Number of pages6
ISSN2405-4569
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2018

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Training, Research, and Working Conditions for Urology Residents in Germany: A Contemporary Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this