TY - JOUR
T1 - The Working Alliance Inventory for guided Internet interventions (WAI-I)
AU - Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
AU - Berger, Thomas
AU - grosse Holtforth, Martin
AU - Krieger, Tobias
AU - Schröder, Johanna
AU - Hohagen, Fritz
AU - Meyer, Björn
AU - Moritz, Steffen
AU - Klein, Jan Philipp
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Objective: This study analyses the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory adapted for guided Internet interventions (WAI-I). Methods: We drew on the data set from a multicenter trial that examined a guided Internet intervention (deprexis) for patients with mild to moderate depression. Two hundred twenty-three patients completed the WAI-I and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ZUF-8) at posttreatment, and the Attitudes toward Psychological Online-Interventions Questionnaire (APOI) at baseline. We ran confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) testing two- and three-factor solutions and calculated Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and correlations of the WAI-I with APOI and ZUF-8. Results: The results suggested a two-factor solution, with a very good model fit and evidence of factor independency, adequate internal consistency, and external validity for the complete scale and the sub-scales. Conclusions: The WAI-I showed as a reliable and valid instrument to capture alliance in guided Internet interventions, which might facilitate process-outcome research and treatment development efforts.
AB - Objective: This study analyses the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory adapted for guided Internet interventions (WAI-I). Methods: We drew on the data set from a multicenter trial that examined a guided Internet intervention (deprexis) for patients with mild to moderate depression. Two hundred twenty-three patients completed the WAI-I and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ZUF-8) at posttreatment, and the Attitudes toward Psychological Online-Interventions Questionnaire (APOI) at baseline. We ran confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) testing two- and three-factor solutions and calculated Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and correlations of the WAI-I with APOI and ZUF-8. Results: The results suggested a two-factor solution, with a very good model fit and evidence of factor independency, adequate internal consistency, and external validity for the complete scale and the sub-scales. Conclusions: The WAI-I showed as a reliable and valid instrument to capture alliance in guided Internet interventions, which might facilitate process-outcome research and treatment development efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084401983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jclp.22823
DO - 10.1002/jclp.22823
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85084401983
SN - 0021-9762
VL - 76
SP - 973
EP - 986
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology
IS - 6
ER -