Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The true P3 is hard to see: Some comments on Kok's (1986) paper on degraded stimuli

Rolf Verleger*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Kok (1986) investigated why P3 amplitudes are reduced when stimuli are degraded. He proposed that a positive moment-related component might overlap P3 after intact stimuli and a negative one after degraded stimuli ("MRP overlap" hypothesis). Discussing his findings, it is suggested that MRP overlap can only account for the result if another overlap hypothesis ("nogo overlap") is added. But even this combined hypothesis cannot explain reducing effects of degradation found in other paradigms. While other overlap hypotheses have been proposed in the literature, the most parsimonious hypothesis is to assume that P3 itself gets smaller after degraded stimuli.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume27
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)45-50
Number of pages6
ISSN0301-0511
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.1988

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The true P3 is hard to see: Some comments on Kok's (1986) paper on degraded stimuli'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this