Abstract
Kok (1986) investigated why P3 amplitudes are reduced when stimuli are degraded. He proposed that a positive moment-related component might overlap P3 after intact stimuli and a negative one after degraded stimuli ("MRP overlap" hypothesis). Discussing his findings, it is suggested that MRP overlap can only account for the result if another overlap hypothesis ("nogo overlap") is added. But even this combined hypothesis cannot explain reducing effects of degradation found in other paradigms. While other overlap hypotheses have been proposed in the literature, the most parsimonious hypothesis is to assume that P3 itself gets smaller after degraded stimuli.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Biological Psychology |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 45-50 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISSN | 0301-0511 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.01.1988 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Research Areas and Centers
- Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The true P3 is hard to see: Some comments on Kok's (1986) paper on degraded stimuli'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver