The “Spider Web” Technique in Difficult Chest Wall Reconstructions: A 5-Year Experience

Background/Objectives: Primary chest wall tumors or malignancies of adjacent organs with chest wall infiltration present a significant challenge for surgical resection and reconstruction. Larger defects involving the sternum, resections in the area of the thoracic apertures, or those near the spine are difficult to reconstruct. The reconstruction has to ensure stability, to prevent paradoxical movements and lung herniation, while also achieving a satisfactory cosmetic result. The “spider web” technique restores chest wall stability by creating a web-like framework made of non-resorbable threads fixed to adjacent bony structures. Additionally, a synthetic mesh is placed over the web construct, and both layers are covered with muscles (local muscles or different types of flaps). In this prospective study, clinical data from patients who underwent surgery using the “spider web” technique were analyzed with respect to chest wall stability, procedure-specific complications, pulmonary function, and patient satisfaction. Methods: A total of 16 patients receiving 18 chest wall resections and reconstructions using the “spider web” technique were followed for at least one year. Chest wall stability and lung function (FEV1 and DLCO) were assessed. Quality of life, cosmetic satisfaction, potential functional impairment, and analgesic consumption were measured using a modified EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 32 months. In all cases, optimal chest wall stability was maintained without impairment of respiratory mechanics. Procedure-specific complications occurred in five cases (27.8%), including seroma (one case), hematoma (two cases), necrosis at the TRAM flap donor site (one case), and mesh infection (one case), all of which were resolved without further complications. Postoperative FEV1 and DLCO were not significantly reduced compared with preoperative values. The global health status score for quality of life was 60 ± 27 points. Nine patients reported being able to ascend at least one floor of stairs without shortness of breath and half of the patients were able to participate in sports activities. One patient required prolonged analgesic medication due to chronic pain. In all cases, patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. Both 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0%. No local recurrence at the chest wall reconstruction site occurred. Conclusions: The “spider web” technique is a highly suitable method for chest wall reconstruction, allowing covering all types of chest wall defects, regardless of size and location. This cost-effective technique not only provides optimal stability but also good functional results.