TY - JOUR
T1 - The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions
AU - Buccino, Giovanni
AU - Baumgaertner, Annette
AU - Colle, Livia
AU - Buechel, Christian
AU - Rizzolatti, Giacomo
AU - Binkofski, Ferdinand
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by VolkswagenStiftung (I/79006 and I/81085), German Ministry for Research and Education (BMBF; 01GO0207 and 01GW0571): MIUR (Ministero Istruzione Università e Ricerca): COFIN to GR and FIRB RBNE018ET9, and EU grant QLG3-CT-2002-00746.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - We can often understand when actions done by others do or do not reflect their intentions. To investigate the neural basis of this capacity we carried out an fMRI study in which volunteers were presented with video-clips showing actions that did reflect the intention of the agent (intended actions) and actions that did not (non-intended actions). Observation of both types of actions activated a common set of areas including the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral premotor cortex and mesial premotor areas. The contrast non-intended vs. intended actions showed activation in the right temporo-parietal junction, left supramarginal gyrus, and mesial prefrontal cortex. The converse contrast did not show any activation. We conclude that our capacity to understand non intended actions is based on the activation of areas signaling unexpected events in spatial and temporal domains, in addition to the activity of the mirror neuron system. The concomitant activation of mesial prefrontal areas, known to be involved in self-referential processing, might reflect how deeply participants are involved in the observed scenes.
AB - We can often understand when actions done by others do or do not reflect their intentions. To investigate the neural basis of this capacity we carried out an fMRI study in which volunteers were presented with video-clips showing actions that did reflect the intention of the agent (intended actions) and actions that did not (non-intended actions). Observation of both types of actions activated a common set of areas including the inferior parietal lobule, the lateral premotor cortex and mesial premotor areas. The contrast non-intended vs. intended actions showed activation in the right temporo-parietal junction, left supramarginal gyrus, and mesial prefrontal cortex. The converse contrast did not show any activation. We conclude that our capacity to understand non intended actions is based on the activation of areas signaling unexpected events in spatial and temporal domains, in addition to the activity of the mirror neuron system. The concomitant activation of mesial prefrontal areas, known to be involved in self-referential processing, might reflect how deeply participants are involved in the observed scenes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247880326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.036
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.036
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 17499159
AN - SCOPUS:34247880326
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 36
SP - T119-T127
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - SUPPL. 2
ER -