TY - JOUR
T1 - The lesion core extent modulates the impact of early perfusion mismatch imaging on outcome variability after thrombectomy in stroke
AU - Marburg, Maria
AU - Rudolf, Linda F.
AU - Matthis, Christine
AU - Neumann, Alexander
AU - Schareck, Constantin
AU - Schacht, Hannes
AU - Schulz, Robert
AU - Machner, Björn
AU - Schramm, Peter
AU - Royl, Georg
AU - Koch, Philipp J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Marburg, Rudolf, Matthis, Neumann, Schareck, Schacht, Schulz, Machner, Schramm, Royl and Koch.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: Despite profitable group effects on functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion (LVO), many patients with successful reperfusion show a non-favorable long-term outcome, highlighting the necessity to identify potential biomarkers predicting outcome variability. In this regard, the role of perfusion mismatch imaging for outcome variability in the early time window within 6 h after symptom onset is a matter of debate. We attempted to investigate under which conditions early perfusion mismatch imaging accounts for variability in functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy. Patients and methods: In a retrospective single-center study, we examined 190 consecutive patients with LVO who were admitted to the Medical Center Lübeck within 6 h after symptom onset, all of whom underwent MT. Perfusion mismatch was quantified by applying the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) on CT-measured cerebral blood flow (CBF-ASPECTS) and subtracting it from an ASPECTS application on cerebral blood volume (CBV-ASPECTS), i.e., ASPECTS mismatch. Using multivariate ordinal regression models, associations between ASPECTS mismatch and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 90 days were assessed. Furthermore, the interaction between ASPECTS mismatch and the core lesion volume was calculated to evaluate conditional associations. Results: ASPECTS mismatch did not correlate with functional outcomes when corrected for multiple influencing covariables. However, interactions between ASPECTS mismatch and CBV-ASPECTS [OR: 1.12 (1.06–1.18), p-value < 0.001], as well as NCCT-ASPECTS [OR: 1.15 (1.06–1.25), p-value < 0.001], did show a significant association with functional outcomes. Model comparisons revealed that, profoundly, in patients with large core lesion volumes (CBV-ASPECTS < 6 or NCCT-ASPECTS < 6), perfusion mismatch showed a negative correlation with the mRS. Discussion and conclusion: Perfusion mismatch imaging within the first 6 h of symptom onset provides valuable insights into the outcome variability of LVO stroke patients receiving thrombectomy but only in patients with large ischemic core lesions.
AB - Introduction: Despite profitable group effects on functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion (LVO), many patients with successful reperfusion show a non-favorable long-term outcome, highlighting the necessity to identify potential biomarkers predicting outcome variability. In this regard, the role of perfusion mismatch imaging for outcome variability in the early time window within 6 h after symptom onset is a matter of debate. We attempted to investigate under which conditions early perfusion mismatch imaging accounts for variability in functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy. Patients and methods: In a retrospective single-center study, we examined 190 consecutive patients with LVO who were admitted to the Medical Center Lübeck within 6 h after symptom onset, all of whom underwent MT. Perfusion mismatch was quantified by applying the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) on CT-measured cerebral blood flow (CBF-ASPECTS) and subtracting it from an ASPECTS application on cerebral blood volume (CBV-ASPECTS), i.e., ASPECTS mismatch. Using multivariate ordinal regression models, associations between ASPECTS mismatch and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 90 days were assessed. Furthermore, the interaction between ASPECTS mismatch and the core lesion volume was calculated to evaluate conditional associations. Results: ASPECTS mismatch did not correlate with functional outcomes when corrected for multiple influencing covariables. However, interactions between ASPECTS mismatch and CBV-ASPECTS [OR: 1.12 (1.06–1.18), p-value < 0.001], as well as NCCT-ASPECTS [OR: 1.15 (1.06–1.25), p-value < 0.001], did show a significant association with functional outcomes. Model comparisons revealed that, profoundly, in patients with large core lesion volumes (CBV-ASPECTS < 6 or NCCT-ASPECTS < 6), perfusion mismatch showed a negative correlation with the mRS. Discussion and conclusion: Perfusion mismatch imaging within the first 6 h of symptom onset provides valuable insights into the outcome variability of LVO stroke patients receiving thrombectomy but only in patients with large ischemic core lesions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85195023137
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2024.1366240
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2024.1366240
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85195023137
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
M1 - 1366240
ER -