The JUPITER registry: 1-year results of transapical aortic valve implantation using a second-generation transcatheter heart valve in patients with aortic stenosis

Miriam Silaschi, Hendrik Treede, Ardawan J. Rastan, Hardy Baumbach, Friedhelm Beyersdorfe, Utz Kappert, Walter Eichinger, Florian Rüter, Thomas L. de Kroon, Rüdiger Lange, Stephan Ensminger, Olaf Wendler*

*Corresponding author for this work
23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established therapy for patients with aortic stenosis (AS) at high surgical risk. The JenaValve™ is a second-generation, self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV), implanted through transapical access (TA). During stent deployment, a specific 'clipping-mechanism' engages native aortic valve cusps for fixation. We present 1-year outcomes of the JUPITER registry, a post-market registry of the JenaValve for TA-TAVR. METHODS: The JUPITER registry is a prospective, multicentre, uncontrolled and observational European study to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the Conformité Européenne-marked JenaValve THV. A total of 180 patients with AS were enrolled between 2012 and 2014. End-points were adjudicated in accordance with the valve academic research consortium document no. 1 definitions. RESULTS: The mean age was 80.4 ± 5.9 years and the mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation I 21.2 ± 14.7%. The procedure was successful in 95.0% (171/180), implantation of a second THV (valve-in-valve) was performed in 2.2% (4/180) and conversion to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was necessary in 2.8% (5/180). No annular rupture or coronary ostia obstruction occurred. Two patients required SAVR after the day of index procedure (1.1%). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 11.1% (20/180), being cardiovascular in 7.2% (13/180). A major stroke occurred in 1.1% (2/180) at 30 days, no additional major strokes were observed during 1 year. All-cause mortality after 30 days was 13.1% (21/160) and combined efficacy at 1 year was 80.8% (122/151). At 1-year follow-up, no patient presented with more than moderate paravalvular leakage, while 2 patients (3.2%) showed moderate, 12 (19.0%) mild and 49 (82.4%) trace/none paravalvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-risk cohort of patients undergoing TA-TAVR for AS, the use of the JenaValve THV is safe and effective. In patients at higher risk for coronary ostia obstruction, annular rupture or with limited aortic valve calcification, the JenaValve might be preferable for implantation due to its clipping-mechanism engaging native aortic valve cusps for fixation with reduced radial forces of the self-expanding stent.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume50
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)874-881
Number of pages8
ISSN1010-7940
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The JUPITER registry: 1-year results of transapical aortic valve implantation using a second-generation transcatheter heart valve in patients with aortic stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this