TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of complex chromosomal rearrangements on the detection of radiosensitivity in cancer patients
AU - Neubauer, Susann
AU - Dunst, Jürgen
AU - Gebhart, Erich
N1 - Funding Information:
Part of this study was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The authors are indebtedt o Dipl. Biol. M. Stumm,M agdeburgf or providing one AT lymphoblastoidc ell line, Dr S. Bala for linguistic advice, and Gabriele Schmitt for excellent technical assistance.T he valuable aid of Dr S. Birkenhake in computer-drawing of the graphsi s gratefully acknowledged.
Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1997/5
Y1 - 1997/5
N2 - Background and purpose: Lymphocytes of a small fraction of cancer patients responded to in vitro irradiation with an extreme chromosomal reaction. A large portion of the observed chromosome aberrations were complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR). The present study is an attempt to define the impact of CCR on the predictive detection of an intrinsic clinical radiosensitivity in cancer patients in more detail. Materials and methods: A three-colour 'FISH-painting' technique (chromosome in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization) was used for the detection of chromosomal rearrangements, induced by in vitro irradiation, in 81 samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes from 66 cancer patients. Thirty-three of those were assigned for radiation therapy, the others having just undergone radiation therapy. Seven healthy individuals served as controls. Results: CCRs are a very rare event in non-irradiated cells. Lymphocytes of patients who had just undergone therapeutic irradiation, however, not only exhibited high basic frequencies of CCR but also responded to in vitro irradiation with a more drastic increase of CCR than did the lymphocytes of non-exposed patients. A high inter individual variability of the reaction to in vitro irradiation could be generally stated. The lymphocytes of patients with clinical signs of an outstanding radiosensitivity responded with an unusually high frequency of CCR. The total number of CCRs detected by CISS was found to be dependent on the interval from a previous radiation therapy and was slightly influenced by previous cytostatic therapy. Irrespective of these influences, patients with clinically defined radiation hypersensitivity were those with the highest radiosensitivity also in cytogenetic terms (including CCR). Conclusion: The successful use of FISH-painting for the detection of CCR, in addition to the general breakage frequency, highlights its suitability in the identification of individual hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation. The time-consuming cytogenetic examination can be considerably reduced by its use.
AB - Background and purpose: Lymphocytes of a small fraction of cancer patients responded to in vitro irradiation with an extreme chromosomal reaction. A large portion of the observed chromosome aberrations were complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR). The present study is an attempt to define the impact of CCR on the predictive detection of an intrinsic clinical radiosensitivity in cancer patients in more detail. Materials and methods: A three-colour 'FISH-painting' technique (chromosome in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization) was used for the detection of chromosomal rearrangements, induced by in vitro irradiation, in 81 samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes from 66 cancer patients. Thirty-three of those were assigned for radiation therapy, the others having just undergone radiation therapy. Seven healthy individuals served as controls. Results: CCRs are a very rare event in non-irradiated cells. Lymphocytes of patients who had just undergone therapeutic irradiation, however, not only exhibited high basic frequencies of CCR but also responded to in vitro irradiation with a more drastic increase of CCR than did the lymphocytes of non-exposed patients. A high inter individual variability of the reaction to in vitro irradiation could be generally stated. The lymphocytes of patients with clinical signs of an outstanding radiosensitivity responded with an unusually high frequency of CCR. The total number of CCRs detected by CISS was found to be dependent on the interval from a previous radiation therapy and was slightly influenced by previous cytostatic therapy. Irrespective of these influences, patients with clinically defined radiation hypersensitivity were those with the highest radiosensitivity also in cytogenetic terms (including CCR). Conclusion: The successful use of FISH-painting for the detection of CCR, in addition to the general breakage frequency, highlights its suitability in the identification of individual hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation. The time-consuming cytogenetic examination can be considerably reduced by its use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030975515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8140(97)01932-4
DO - 10.1016/S0167-8140(97)01932-4
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 9192966
AN - SCOPUS:0030975515
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 43
SP - 189
EP - 195
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -
