TY - JOUR
T1 - The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome
AU - Habermann, Jens K.
AU - Doering, Jana
AU - Hautaniemi, Sampsa
AU - Roblick, Uwe J.
AU - Bündgen, Nana K.
AU - Nicorici, Daniel
AU - Kronenwett, Ulrike
AU - Rathnagiriswaran, Shruti
AU - Mettu, Rama K.R.
AU - Yan, Ma
AU - Krüger, Stefan
AU - Bruch, Hans Peter
AU - Auer, Gert
AU - Guo, Nancy L.
AU - Ried, Thomas
PY - 2009/4/1
Y1 - 2009/4/1
N2 - Recently, expression profiling of breast carcinomas has revealed gene signatures that predict clinical outcome, and discerned prognostically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Measurement of the degree of genomic instability provides a very similar stratification of prognostic groups. We therefore hypothesized that these features are linked. We used gene expression profiling of 48 breast cancer specimens that profoundly differed in their degree of genomic instability and identified a set of 12 genes that defines the 2 groups. The biological and prognostic significance of this gene set was established through survival prediction in published data-sets from patients with breast cancer. Of note, the gene expression signatures that define specific prognostic subtypes in other breast cancer datasets, such as luminal A and B, basal, normal-like, and ERBB2+, and prognostic signatures including MammaPrint and Oncotype DX, predicted genomic instability in our samples. This remarkable congruence suggests a biological interdependence of poor-prognosis gene signatures, breast cancer subtypes, genomic instability, and clinical outcome.
AB - Recently, expression profiling of breast carcinomas has revealed gene signatures that predict clinical outcome, and discerned prognostically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Measurement of the degree of genomic instability provides a very similar stratification of prognostic groups. We therefore hypothesized that these features are linked. We used gene expression profiling of 48 breast cancer specimens that profoundly differed in their degree of genomic instability and identified a set of 12 genes that defines the 2 groups. The biological and prognostic significance of this gene set was established through survival prediction in published data-sets from patients with breast cancer. Of note, the gene expression signatures that define specific prognostic subtypes in other breast cancer datasets, such as luminal A and B, basal, normal-like, and ERBB2+, and prognostic signatures including MammaPrint and Oncotype DX, predicted genomic instability in our samples. This remarkable congruence suggests a biological interdependence of poor-prognosis gene signatures, breast cancer subtypes, genomic instability, and clinical outcome.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61449083794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijc.24017
DO - 10.1002/ijc.24017
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 19101988
AN - SCOPUS:61449083794
SN - 0020-7136
VL - 124
SP - 1552
EP - 1564
JO - International Journal of Cancer
JF - International Journal of Cancer
IS - 7
ER -