The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation

Tilman Maurer*, Laura Rottner, Hisaki Makimoto, Bruno Reissmann, Christian H. Heeger, Christine Lemes, Thomas Fink, Johannes Riedl, Francesco Santoro, Peter Wohlmuth, Marius Volkmer, Shibu Mathew, Andreas Metzner, Feifan Ouyang, Karl Heinz Kuck, Christian Sohns

*Corresponding author for this work
14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate feasibility and safety as well as 1-year clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a unique radiofrequency ablation catheter (“Thermocool SmartTouch SurroundFlow”; STSF) incorporating both, contact force (CF) sensing technology and enhanced tip irrigation with 56 holes, in one device. Methods: A total of 110 patients suffering from drug-refractory atrial fibrillation underwent wide area circumferential PVI using either the STSF ablation catheter (75 consecutive patients, study group) or a CF catheter with conventional tip irrigation (“Thermocool SmartTouch”, 35 consecutive patients, control group). For each ablation lesion, a target CF of ≥ 10–39 g and a force time integral (FTI) of > 400 g s was targeted. Results: Acute PVI was achieved in all patients with target CF obtained in > 85% of ablation points when using either device. Mean procedure time (131.3 ± 33.7 min in the study group vs. 133.0 ± 42.0 min in the control group; p = 0.99), mean fluoroscopy time (14.0 ± 6 vs. 13.5 ± 6.6 min; p = 0.56) and total ablation time were not significantly different (1751.0 ± 394.0 vs. 1604.6 ± 287.8 s; p = 0.2). However, there was a marked reduction in total irrigation fluid delivery by 51.7% (265.52 ± 64.4 vs. 539.6 ± 118.2 ml; p < 0.01). The Kaplan–Meier estimate 12-month arrhythmia–free survival after the index procedure following a 3-month blanking period was 79.9% (95% CI 70.4%, 90.4%) for the study group and 66.7% for the control group (95% CI 50.2%, 88.5%). This finding did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.18). Major complications occurred in 2/75 patients (2.7%; one pericardial tamponade and one transient ischemic attack) in the study group and no patient in the control group (p = 18). Conclusion: PVI using the STSF catheter is safe and effective and results in beneficial 1-year clinical outcome. The improved tip irrigation leads to a significant reduction in procedural fluid burden.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Volume107
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1003-1012
Number of pages10
ISSN1861-0684
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this