TY - JOUR
T1 - The accuracy of the oxygen washout technique for functional residual capacity assessment during spontaneous breathing
AU - Heinze, Hermann
AU - Schaaf, Bernhard
AU - Grefer, Jochen
AU - Klotz, Karl
AU - Eichler, Wolfgang
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/3
Y1 - 2007/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) is of considerable interest for monitoring patients with lung injury. The lack of instruments has impeded routine bedside FRC measurement. Recently, a simple automated method for FRC assessment by O2 washout has been introduced. We designed this study to evaluate the accuracy of FRC measurement using the O2 washout technique. METHODS: The LUFU system (Draeger, Luebeck, Germany) estimates FRC by O2 washout, a variant of multiple breath nitrogen washout. This technique uses a sidestream O2-analyzer to calculate FRC from end-inspired and end-expired O2 concentrations during fast changes of Fio2. We measured FRC in 23 healthy, spontaneously breathing volunteers in the sitting position using three techniques: 1) helium dilution (FRC-He), 2) body plethysmography (FRC-bp), 3) oxygen washout (FRC-O2). RESULTS: FRC-O2 (mean 4.1 ± 1.1 L, range 2.4-6.9 L) corresponds with FRC-He (mean 4.0 ± 1.0 L, range 2.4-6.2 L; bias of FRC-O2: -0.2 ± 0.4 L) and FRC-bp (mean 4.2 ± 1.0 L, range 2.8-6.1 L; bias of FRC-O2: 0.1 ± 0.6 L). CONCLUSIONS: The bias and precision of the O2 washout technique using the LUFU system were clinically acceptable when compared with FRC-He and FRC-bp for FRC assessment in spontaneously breathing volunteers.
AB - BACKGROUND: Measurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) is of considerable interest for monitoring patients with lung injury. The lack of instruments has impeded routine bedside FRC measurement. Recently, a simple automated method for FRC assessment by O2 washout has been introduced. We designed this study to evaluate the accuracy of FRC measurement using the O2 washout technique. METHODS: The LUFU system (Draeger, Luebeck, Germany) estimates FRC by O2 washout, a variant of multiple breath nitrogen washout. This technique uses a sidestream O2-analyzer to calculate FRC from end-inspired and end-expired O2 concentrations during fast changes of Fio2. We measured FRC in 23 healthy, spontaneously breathing volunteers in the sitting position using three techniques: 1) helium dilution (FRC-He), 2) body plethysmography (FRC-bp), 3) oxygen washout (FRC-O2). RESULTS: FRC-O2 (mean 4.1 ± 1.1 L, range 2.4-6.9 L) corresponds with FRC-He (mean 4.0 ± 1.0 L, range 2.4-6.2 L; bias of FRC-O2: -0.2 ± 0.4 L) and FRC-bp (mean 4.2 ± 1.0 L, range 2.8-6.1 L; bias of FRC-O2: 0.1 ± 0.6 L). CONCLUSIONS: The bias and precision of the O2 washout technique using the LUFU system were clinically acceptable when compared with FRC-He and FRC-bp for FRC assessment in spontaneously breathing volunteers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847183864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000255044.05784.95
DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000255044.05784.95
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 17312216
AN - SCOPUS:33847183864
SN - 0003-2999
VL - 104
SP - 598
EP - 604
JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia
JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia
IS - 3
ER -