TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeted axillary dissection
T2 - worldwide variations in clinical practice
AU - TAD Study Group
AU - Kontos, Michalis
AU - Kanavidis, Prodromos
AU - Kühn, Thorsten
AU - Masannat, Yazan
AU - Gulluoglu, Bahadir
AU - Gonzalez, Eduardo
AU - Walker, Melanie
AU - Collins, A. J.
AU - Nano, M. T.
AU - Heron, Kim
AU - Penington, Beth
AU - He, Mike
AU - Janu, Norman
AU - Read, Katrina
AU - Fernandez, Jose Cid
AU - Brown, Belinda
AU - Shah, Aashit
AU - Snook, Kylie
AU - Forsyth, Sarah
AU - Bingham, Janne
AU - Lippey, Jocelyn
AU - Symonds, Joel
AU - Winder, Alec
AU - Bartlett, Nita
AU - Vujovic, Petar
AU - Gough, Jenny
AU - Birks, Sarah
AU - Meybodi, Farid
AU - Hamza, Saud
AU - Elder, Elisabeth
AU - Stranzl, Heidi
AU - Kosayeva, Tahmina
AU - Vergauwen, Glenn
AU - Letzkus, Jaime
AU - Benitez, Gilberto
AU - Cabrera, Eduardo
AU - Kitiris, Evros
AU - Kailides, Michalis
AU - Corral, Patricio
AU - Ali, Khaled Mohamed Abdelwahab
AU - Niinikoski, Laura
AU - Weinand, Kerstin
AU - Hasmüller, Stephan
AU - Kurz, Conny
AU - Kolberg, Hans Christian
AU - Thalmann, Ingo
AU - Banys-Paluchowski, Maggie
AU - Manika, Aikaterini
AU - Venizelos, Vasileios
AU - Metaxas, Georgios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Purpose: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) for the axillary staging of clinically node-positive (cN +) breast cancer patients converting to clinically node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), has gained popularity due to its minimal false negative rate and low arm morbidity. The aim of this study is to shed more light on the variation in the clinical practice globally in terms of indications and perceived limitations of TAD. Methods: A panel of expert breast surgeons constructed a structured questionnaire comprising of 18 questions and asked surgeons worldwide for their opinions and routine practice on TAD. The questionnaire was electronically distributed and answers were collected between May 1st and August 1st 2022. Results: Responses included 137 entries from 36 countries. Of them, 73.7% consider TAD for cN + patients planned to receive NAC. Among them, the greatest number of respondents (45%) perform the procedure for tumours up to T3, whereas 27% regardless of T-stage. The majority (42%) perform TAD on patients with 1–3 positive nodes and only 30% consider TAD when matted nodes are present. HER2 positive and Triple Negative subtypes are more likely to undergo TAD than Luminal A and B (86%, 79.1%, 39.5%, and 62.8%, respectively). Maximum acceptable lymph node burden is median 3 nodes for any subtype with a tendency to accept more positive nodes for Triple Negative. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the differences in current practice regarding TAD as well as the fact that the biology of the tumour heavily affects the method of axillary staging.
AB - Purpose: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) for the axillary staging of clinically node-positive (cN +) breast cancer patients converting to clinically node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), has gained popularity due to its minimal false negative rate and low arm morbidity. The aim of this study is to shed more light on the variation in the clinical practice globally in terms of indications and perceived limitations of TAD. Methods: A panel of expert breast surgeons constructed a structured questionnaire comprising of 18 questions and asked surgeons worldwide for their opinions and routine practice on TAD. The questionnaire was electronically distributed and answers were collected between May 1st and August 1st 2022. Results: Responses included 137 entries from 36 countries. Of them, 73.7% consider TAD for cN + patients planned to receive NAC. Among them, the greatest number of respondents (45%) perform the procedure for tumours up to T3, whereas 27% regardless of T-stage. The majority (42%) perform TAD on patients with 1–3 positive nodes and only 30% consider TAD when matted nodes are present. HER2 positive and Triple Negative subtypes are more likely to undergo TAD than Luminal A and B (86%, 79.1%, 39.5%, and 62.8%, respectively). Maximum acceptable lymph node burden is median 3 nodes for any subtype with a tendency to accept more positive nodes for Triple Negative. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the differences in current practice regarding TAD as well as the fact that the biology of the tumour heavily affects the method of axillary staging.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85181463959
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-023-07204-7
DO - 10.1007/s10549-023-07204-7
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85181463959
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 204
SP - 389
EP - 396
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -