TY - JOUR
T1 - Studying trait-characteristics and neural correlates of the emotional ego- and altercentric bias using an audiovisual paradigm
AU - Goregliad Fjaellingsdal, Tatiana
AU - Makowka, Nikolas
AU - Krämer, Ulrike M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Annika Kühle, Greta Zschoche, Jasmin Thurley, and Cornelia Ohlhorn for their help in data acquisition. Ulrike M. Krämer is supported by the DFG.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In social interactions, emotional biases can arise when the emotional state of oneself and another person are incongruent. A person’s ability to judge the other’s emotional state can then be biased by their own emotional state, leading to an emotional egocentric bias (EEB). Alternatively, a person’s perception of their own emotional state can be biased by the other’s emotional state leading to an emotional altercentric bias (EAB). Using a modified audiovisual paradigm, we examined in three studies (n = 171; two online & one lab-based study) whether emotional biases can be considered traits by measuring two timepoints within participant and relating empathy trait scores to emotional biases, as well as the electrophysiological correlates of emotional biases. In all studies, we found a congruency effect, reflecting an EEB and EAB of small size. Both biases failed to correlate significantly within participants across timepoints and did not display significant relationships with empathy trait scores. On the electrophysiological level, we did not find any neural emotional bias effects in the time–frequency domain. Our results suggest that EEB and EAB effects are strongly task sensitive. Caution is warranted when studying interindividual differences in emotional biases using this paradigm, as they did not show significant test-retest reliabilities.
AB - In social interactions, emotional biases can arise when the emotional state of oneself and another person are incongruent. A person’s ability to judge the other’s emotional state can then be biased by their own emotional state, leading to an emotional egocentric bias (EEB). Alternatively, a person’s perception of their own emotional state can be biased by the other’s emotional state leading to an emotional altercentric bias (EAB). Using a modified audiovisual paradigm, we examined in three studies (n = 171; two online & one lab-based study) whether emotional biases can be considered traits by measuring two timepoints within participant and relating empathy trait scores to emotional biases, as well as the electrophysiological correlates of emotional biases. In all studies, we found a congruency effect, reflecting an EEB and EAB of small size. Both biases failed to correlate significantly within participants across timepoints and did not display significant relationships with empathy trait scores. On the electrophysiological level, we did not find any neural emotional bias effects in the time–frequency domain. Our results suggest that EEB and EAB effects are strongly task sensitive. Caution is warranted when studying interindividual differences in emotional biases using this paradigm, as they did not show significant test-retest reliabilities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159695335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2023.2211253
DO - 10.1080/02699931.2023.2211253
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 37203227
AN - SCOPUS:85159695335
SN - 0269-9931
VL - 37
SP - 818
EP - 834
JO - Cognition and Emotion
JF - Cognition and Emotion
IS - 4
ER -