Strukturiertes Curriculum für die urologische Facharztausbildung: Chancen und Grenzen

Translated title of the contribution: Structured training curriculum for urological residents: chances and limits

J. P. Struck*, A. Cebulla, B. Ralla, J. Koenig

*Corresponding author for this work
2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current surveys show that 45% of German urologic residents do not feel sufficiently prepared for their later urologic work, and 85% lack a structured training curriculum in their home institutions. Furthermore, they report a lack of transparency and evaluations as well as economic constraints. This gives reason to revise and adapt the current urologic training curriculum. In the following article we compare the current urologic curriculum with other disciplines and discuss chances and limits of possible future models. These include better definitions of basic training skills, specialization, a structured evaluation system, standardization of exams and room for research.

Translated title of the contributionStructured training curriculum for urological residents: chances and limits
Original languageGerman
JournalUrologe
Volume58
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)109-113
Number of pages5
ISSN0340-2592
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.02.2019

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structured training curriculum for urological residents: chances and limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this