TY - JOUR
T1 - Statistical Shape Modeling of the Left Ventricle
T2 - Myocardial Infarct Classification Challenge
AU - Suinesiaputra, Avan
AU - Ablin, Pierre
AU - Alba, Xenia
AU - Alessandrini, Martino
AU - Allen, Jack
AU - Bai, Wenjia
AU - Cimen, Serkan
AU - Claes, Peter
AU - Cowan, Brett R.
AU - Dhooge, Jan
AU - Duchateau, Nicolas
AU - Ehrhardt, Jan
AU - Frangi, Alejandro F.
AU - Gooya, Ali
AU - Grau, Vicente
AU - Lekadir, Karim
AU - Lu, Allen
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Anirban
AU - Oksuz, Ilkay
AU - Parajuli, Nripesh
AU - Pennec, Xavier
AU - Pereanez, Marco
AU - Pinto, Catarina
AU - Piras, Paolo
AU - Rohe, Marc Michel
AU - Rueckert, Daniel
AU - Saring, Dennis
AU - Sermesant, Maxime
AU - Siddiqi, Kaleem
AU - Tabassian, Mahdi
AU - Teresi, Luciano
AU - Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.
AU - Wilms, Matthias
AU - Young, Alistair A.
AU - Zhang, Xingyu
AU - Medrano-Gracia, Pau
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Statistical shape modeling is a powerful tool for visualizing and quantifying geometric and functional patterns of the heart. After myocardial infarction (MI), the left ventricle typically remodels in response to physiological challenges. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to describe statistical shape changes. Which method best characterizes the left ventricular remodeling after MI is an open research question. A better descriptor of remodeling is expected to provide a more accurate evaluation of disease status in MI patients. We therefore designed a challenge to test shape characterization in MI given a set of three-dimensional left ventricular surface points. The training set comprised 100 MI patients, and 100 asymptomatic volunteers (AV). The challenge was initiated in 2015 at the Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart workshop, in conjunction with the MICCAI conference. The training set with labels was provided to participants, who were asked to submit the likelihood of MI from a different (validation) set of 200 cases (100 AV and 100 MI). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used as the outcome measures. The goals of this challenge were to 1) establish a common dataset for evaluating statistical shape modeling algorithms in MI, and 2) test whether statistical shape modeling provides additional information characterizing MI patients over standard clinical measures. Eleven groups with a wide variety of classification and feature extraction approaches participated in this challenge. All methods achieved excellent classification results with accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.98. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were all above 0.90. Four methods showed significantly higher performance than standard clinical measures. The dataset and software for evaluation are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project website.1 1 http://www.cardiacatlas.org.
AB - Statistical shape modeling is a powerful tool for visualizing and quantifying geometric and functional patterns of the heart. After myocardial infarction (MI), the left ventricle typically remodels in response to physiological challenges. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to describe statistical shape changes. Which method best characterizes the left ventricular remodeling after MI is an open research question. A better descriptor of remodeling is expected to provide a more accurate evaluation of disease status in MI patients. We therefore designed a challenge to test shape characterization in MI given a set of three-dimensional left ventricular surface points. The training set comprised 100 MI patients, and 100 asymptomatic volunteers (AV). The challenge was initiated in 2015 at the Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart workshop, in conjunction with the MICCAI conference. The training set with labels was provided to participants, who were asked to submit the likelihood of MI from a different (validation) set of 200 cases (100 AV and 100 MI). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used as the outcome measures. The goals of this challenge were to 1) establish a common dataset for evaluating statistical shape modeling algorithms in MI, and 2) test whether statistical shape modeling provides additional information characterizing MI patients over standard clinical measures. Eleven groups with a wide variety of classification and feature extraction approaches participated in this challenge. All methods achieved excellent classification results with accuracy ranges from 0.83 to 0.98. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were all above 0.90. Four methods showed significantly higher performance than standard clinical measures. The dataset and software for evaluation are available from the Cardiac Atlas Project website.1 1 http://www.cardiacatlas.org.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043297427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2652449
DO - 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2652449
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 28103561
AN - SCOPUS:85043297427
SN - 2168-2194
VL - 22
SP - 503
EP - 515
JO - IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
JF - IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IS - 2
ER -