TY - JOUR
T1 - Severe disease reactivation in four patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after fingolimod cessation
AU - Berger, Benjamin
AU - Baumgartner, Annette
AU - Rauer, Sebastian
AU - Mader, Irina
AU - Luetzen, Niklas
AU - Farenkopf, Ulrich
AU - Stich, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015/5/15
Y1 - 2015/5/15
N2 - Objectives: Fingolimod is a well-established, highly effective immunomodulatory treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, little is known about disease course after its discontinuation. Methods: This is a case series on four patients with RRMS who had a severe reactivation after fingolimod discontinuation. Results: One patient had pretreatment with glatiramer acetate, interferon-β 1b and interferon-β 1a and another with interferon-β 1a, intravenous immunoglobulins and natalizumab whereas the other two were therapy naïve before fingolimod initiation. Patients were treated with fingolimod for two, thirty, forty-five and seventy-eight months, respectively. Fingolimod had to be discontinued because of persisting lymphopenia, severe varicella zoster virus infection, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and increased liver function enzymes, respectively. Between two to four months after fingolimod cessation these patients had a severe relapse. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at this point revealed multiple new lesions, partially with contrast ring enhancement. Partial recovery was achieved after steroid pulse therapy followed by plasma exchange in two patients. Conclusions: Despite the limited evidence from our case series on potential disease reactivation exceeding pre-fingolimod activity in a subgroup of RRMS patients, particularly patients with previously high disease activity should undergo frequent clinical as well as radiological monitoring after fingolimod discontinuation.
AB - Objectives: Fingolimod is a well-established, highly effective immunomodulatory treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, little is known about disease course after its discontinuation. Methods: This is a case series on four patients with RRMS who had a severe reactivation after fingolimod discontinuation. Results: One patient had pretreatment with glatiramer acetate, interferon-β 1b and interferon-β 1a and another with interferon-β 1a, intravenous immunoglobulins and natalizumab whereas the other two were therapy naïve before fingolimod initiation. Patients were treated with fingolimod for two, thirty, forty-five and seventy-eight months, respectively. Fingolimod had to be discontinued because of persisting lymphopenia, severe varicella zoster virus infection, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and increased liver function enzymes, respectively. Between two to four months after fingolimod cessation these patients had a severe relapse. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at this point revealed multiple new lesions, partially with contrast ring enhancement. Partial recovery was achieved after steroid pulse therapy followed by plasma exchange in two patients. Conclusions: Despite the limited evidence from our case series on potential disease reactivation exceeding pre-fingolimod activity in a subgroup of RRMS patients, particularly patients with previously high disease activity should undergo frequent clinical as well as radiological monitoring after fingolimod discontinuation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928545069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.03.022
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 25903738
AN - SCOPUS:84928545069
SN - 0165-5728
VL - 282
SP - 118
EP - 122
JO - Journal of Neuroimmunology
JF - Journal of Neuroimmunology
ER -