Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring: a prospective, clinical validation study

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the comparability of self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET) with conventional two-dimensional transvaginal sonography (2D-TVS) monitoring during assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.

DESIGN: Single center, observational, single-blinded cohort study.

SETTING: University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENT(S): A total of 60 women undergoing ART cycles.

INTERVENTION(S): Explanation, training, and use of SOET system, and measurements of follicular and endometrial diameter with SOET and 2D-TVS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Correlation of the total number of follicles >10 mm measured by SOET versus conventional 2D-TVS.

RESULT(S): In 16 cases (26.7%) the images were judged unsuitable for analysis. In these excluded cases the body mass index (BMI) was statistically significantly higher (29.3 vs. 24.4 kg/m(2)). The total number of follicles >10 mm was highly similar comparing SOET with conventional 2D-TVS (r = 0.91). For the concordance of whether more than 19 follicles or more than 25 follicles >10 mm were present, we found agreement between the methods in 43 of 44 cases (κ = 0.88) and 43 of 44 cases (κ = 0.85), respectively. For concordance on predefined human chorionic gonadotropin administration criteria, agreement was found in 39 of 44 cases (κ = 0.734).

CONCLUSION(S): The incidence of SOET videos not suitable for analysis seems to be associated with higher BMI. Otherwise, SOET showed good agreement with conventional 2D-TVS both for follicles and endometrium measurements. More importantly we also found good concordance regarding the cutoffs relevant for clinical decisions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume106
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)306-310.e1
ISSN0015-0282
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 08.2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring: a prospective, clinical validation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this