TY - JOUR
T1 - Second-Generation Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Persistent Left Superior Caval Vein
AU - Santoro, Francesco
AU - Rillig, Andreas
AU - Sohns, Christian
AU - Pott, Alexander
AU - Brunetti, Natale Daniele
AU - Reissmann, Bruno
AU - Lemeš, Christine
AU - Maurer, Tilman
AU - Fink, Thomas
AU - Hashiguchi, Naotaka
AU - Sano, Makoto
AU - Mathew, Shibu
AU - Dahme, Tillman
AU - Ouyang, Feifan
AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz
AU - Tilz, Roland Richard
AU - Metzner, Andreas
AU - Heeger, Christian Hendrik
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Rillig has received travel grants and speaker honoraria from Medtronic. Dr. Dahme has received speaker fees and consulting fees from Medtronic. Dr. Kuck is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. Dr. Tilz has received research grants from Medtronic and Biotronik; and has received travel grants from Cardiofocus; has relationships with Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbott, Sentrheart, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and has received Speaker Bureau honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbott, Sentrheart, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr. Metzher has received Speaker Bureau honoraria and travel grants from Medtronic. Dr. Heeger has received travel grants from Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Objectives: This study sought to assess the acute success rate, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) treated with second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon (CB2). Background: PLSVC is a cardiac anomaly associated with AF. Methods: Between July 2012 and October 2018, 8 patients from 4 German high-volume centers referred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) demonstrated a PLSVC. PVI and ablation within the PLSVC was performed using the CB2. Results: A total of 2,876 patients were treated with CB2-based PVI. Eight patients (0.28%; mean 65 ± 7 years of age, 2 paroxysmal, 6 with persistent AF, mean left atrial size of 44 ± 4 mm) presenting with PLSVC were evaluated. All patients underwent PVI, and 3 of 8 patients with documented triggered activity from PLSVC underwent PLSVC ablation with CB2. Electrical isolation of PLSVC was achieved in 2 of 3 patients. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 120 ± 22 min and 32 ± 18 min, respectively. In 2 of 8 patients, major complications (right phrenic nerve palsy) occurred during right PV ablation. After 3 months, 1 of 2 patients recovered from right phrenic nerve palsy. Two patients underwent a redo procedure after AF recurrence, demonstrating PV reconnection but no triggers from PLSVC. Freedom from AF after 332 days of follow-up was 63%. Conclusions: CB2 ablation for AF in patients with PLSVC is feasible, with an increased risk for right phrenic nerve palsy. Electrical isolation of PLSVC can be achieved with the CB2 in most patients.
AB - Objectives: This study sought to assess the acute success rate, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) treated with second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon (CB2). Background: PLSVC is a cardiac anomaly associated with AF. Methods: Between July 2012 and October 2018, 8 patients from 4 German high-volume centers referred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) demonstrated a PLSVC. PVI and ablation within the PLSVC was performed using the CB2. Results: A total of 2,876 patients were treated with CB2-based PVI. Eight patients (0.28%; mean 65 ± 7 years of age, 2 paroxysmal, 6 with persistent AF, mean left atrial size of 44 ± 4 mm) presenting with PLSVC were evaluated. All patients underwent PVI, and 3 of 8 patients with documented triggered activity from PLSVC underwent PLSVC ablation with CB2. Electrical isolation of PLSVC was achieved in 2 of 3 patients. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 120 ± 22 min and 32 ± 18 min, respectively. In 2 of 8 patients, major complications (right phrenic nerve palsy) occurred during right PV ablation. After 3 months, 1 of 2 patients recovered from right phrenic nerve palsy. Two patients underwent a redo procedure after AF recurrence, demonstrating PV reconnection but no triggers from PLSVC. Freedom from AF after 332 days of follow-up was 63%. Conclusions: CB2 ablation for AF in patients with PLSVC is feasible, with an increased risk for right phrenic nerve palsy. Electrical isolation of PLSVC can be achieved with the CB2 in most patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065666887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.02.004
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 31122381
AN - SCOPUS:85065666887
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 5
SP - 590
EP - 598
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 5
ER -