TY - JOUR
T1 - Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease
AU - REACH2 Trial Group
AU - Zeiser, Robert
AU - von Bubnoff, Nikolas
AU - Butler, Jason
AU - Mohty, Mohamad
AU - Niederwieser, Dietger
AU - Or, Reuven
AU - Szer, Jeff
AU - Wagner, Eva M.
AU - Zuckerman, Tsila
AU - Mahuzier, Bruyère
AU - Xu, Judith
AU - Wilke, Celine
AU - Gandhi, Kunal K.
AU - Socié, Gérard
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Novartis.
Funding Information:
Dr. Zeiser reports receiving lecture fees from Incyte, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; Dr. von Bubnoff, receiving grant support, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from Novartis and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Mohty, receiving grant support, lecture fees, and consulting fees from Janssen, Sanofi, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Takeda, lecture fees and consulting fees from Am-gen, grant support from Roche, and advisory board fees from Novartis; Dr. Niederwieser, receiving advisory board fees from Cellectis and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis; Dr. Szer, receiving advisory board fees from Amgen and Sanofi, grant support, advisory board fees, and lecture fees from Alexion, travel support from Pfizer, reimbursement for a journal subscription from MSD, fees for serving on a study monitoring committee from Prevail Therapeutics, and advisory board fees, lecture fees, and travel support from Takeda; Dr. Wagner, receiving travel support from Medac and advisory board fees from Pfizer, MSD, and Kite (a Gilead company); Dr. Zuckerman, receiving consulting fees from BioSight and Cellect Biotechnology and advisory board fees from Novartis and Janssen; Dr. Mahuzier, being employed by Novartis; Ms. Xu, being employed by Novartis; Dr. Wilke, being employed by and owning stock in Novartis; Dr. Gandhi, being employed by and owning stock in Novartis; and Dr. Socié being a consultant for and receiving a research grant from Alexion, receiving lecture fees from Incyte, Amgen, and Therakos, and receiving travel support from Novartis. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/7
Y1 - 2020/5/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy.
AB - BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084642915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1917635
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1917635
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 32320566
AN - SCOPUS:85084642915
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 382
SP - 1800
EP - 1810
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 19
ER -