Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes from 16 International Expert Centers

Philip C. Muller, Eva Breuer, Felix Nickel, Sabino Zani, Emanuele Kauffmann, Lorenzo De Franco, Christoph Tschuor, Paul Suno Krohn, Stefan K. Burgdorf, Jan Philipp Jonas, Christian E. Oberkofler, Henrik Petrowsky, Olivier Saint-Marc, Leonard Seelen, Izaak Quintus Molenaar, Ulrich Wellner, Tobias Keck, Andrea Coratti, Jacob L. Van Dam, Roeland De WildeBas Groot Koerkamp, Valentina Valle, Pier Giulianotti, Elie Ghabi, David Moskal, Harish Lavu, Dionisios Vrochides, John Martinie, Charles Yeo, Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez, Benedetto Ielpo, Pranay S. Ajay, Mihir M. Shah, David A. Kooby, Song Gao, Jihui Hao, Jin He, Ugo Boggi, Thilo Hackert, Peter Allen, Inne H.M. Borel-Rinkes*, Pierre Alain Clavien

*Corresponding author for this work
20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Robotic distal pancreatectomy (DP) is an emerging attractive approach, but its role compared with laparoscopic or open surgery remains unclear. Benchmark values are novel and objective tools for such comparisons. The aim of this study was to identify benchmark cutoffs for many outcome parameters for DP with or without splenectomy beyond the learning curve. Methods: This study analyzed outcomes from international expert centers from patients undergoing robotic DP for malignant or benign lesions. After excluding the first 10 cases in each center to reduce the effect of the learning curve, consecutive patients were included from the start of robotic DP up to June 2020. Benchmark patients had no significant comorbidities. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all benchmark centers. Benchmark values were compared with a laparoscopic control group from 4 high-volume centers and published open DP landmark series. Results: Sixteen centers contributed 755 cases, whereof 345 benchmark patients (46%) were included the analysis. Benchmark cutoffs included: operation time ≤300 minutes, conversion rate ≤3%, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula ≤32%, 3 months major complication rate ≤26.7%, and lymph node retrieval ≥9. The comprehensive complication index at 3 months was ≤8.7 without deterioration thereafter. Compared with robotic DP, laparoscopy had significantly higher conversion rates (5×) and overall complications, while open DP was associated with more blood loss and longer hospital stay. Conclusion: This first benchmark study demonstrates that robotic DP provides superior postoperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open DP. Robotic DP may be expected to become the approach of choice in minimally invasive DP.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume278
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)253-259
Number of pages7
ISSN0003-4932
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2023

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)
  • Centers: University Cancer Center Schleswig-Holstein (UCCSH)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 205-25 General and Visceral Surgery
  • 205-14 Haematology, Oncology

Cite this