TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of a multicenter study investigating the potential impact of the overall treatment time on outcomes of radiation therapy alone with 5×4 Gy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Veninga, Theo
AU - Conde-Moreno, Antonio J.
AU - Cacicedo, Jon
AU - Metz, Michaela
AU - Šegedin, Barbara
AU - Norkus, Darius
AU - Rudat, Volker
AU - Schild, Steven E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Purpose/Objective A 5×4 Gy program is commonly used for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). It is unclear whether an overall treatment time (OTT) of 5 days (5 consecutive fractions) results in better outcomes than an OTT of 7 days (ie, no irradiation during the weekend). Methods and materials A total of 111 patients who received 5×4 Gy over 5 consecutive days were retrospectively compared with 277 patients treated with 5×4 Gy over 7 days (no irradiation during the weekend) for effect on motor function, local control of MESCC, and overall survival (OS). Ten further characteristics were evaluated: age, gender, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, primary tumor type, time developing motor deficits, walking ability, vertebrae involved, and performance status. Results On multivariate analysis regarding post-radiation therapy motor function, primary tumor type (P = .011) and time developing motor weakness (P < .001) were significant, whereas the OTT did not even achieve significance on univariate analysis (P = .99). On multivariate analysis of local control, visceral metastases (P = .006) were significant. Again, the OTT was not even significant on univariate analysis (P = .81). On multivariate analysis of OS, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC (P = .015), visceral metastases (P .001), tumor type (P = .003), walking ability (P < .001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (P < .001) achieved significance. Even on univariate analysis, OTT did not have an effect on OS (P = .79). Conclusions Longer OTT did not impair outcomes of irradiation with 5×4 Gy for MESCC; thus, no compensation (for example an additional radiation fraction) is necessary if the radiation treatment is not continued during the weekend.
AB - Purpose/Objective A 5×4 Gy program is commonly used for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). It is unclear whether an overall treatment time (OTT) of 5 days (5 consecutive fractions) results in better outcomes than an OTT of 7 days (ie, no irradiation during the weekend). Methods and materials A total of 111 patients who received 5×4 Gy over 5 consecutive days were retrospectively compared with 277 patients treated with 5×4 Gy over 7 days (no irradiation during the weekend) for effect on motor function, local control of MESCC, and overall survival (OS). Ten further characteristics were evaluated: age, gender, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, primary tumor type, time developing motor deficits, walking ability, vertebrae involved, and performance status. Results On multivariate analysis regarding post-radiation therapy motor function, primary tumor type (P = .011) and time developing motor weakness (P < .001) were significant, whereas the OTT did not even achieve significance on univariate analysis (P = .99). On multivariate analysis of local control, visceral metastases (P = .006) were significant. Again, the OTT was not even significant on univariate analysis (P = .81). On multivariate analysis of OS, interval tumor diagnosis to MESCC (P = .015), visceral metastases (P .001), tumor type (P = .003), walking ability (P < .001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (P < .001) achieved significance. Even on univariate analysis, OTT did not have an effect on OS (P = .79). Conclusions Longer OTT did not impair outcomes of irradiation with 5×4 Gy for MESCC; thus, no compensation (for example an additional radiation fraction) is necessary if the radiation treatment is not continued during the weekend.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014562770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.005
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 28274397
AN - SCOPUS:85014562770
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 7
SP - 137
EP - 144
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 2
ER -