TY - JOUR
T1 - Renal denervation improves exercise blood pressure: insights from a randomized, sham-controlled trial
AU - Fengler, Karl
AU - Heinemann, Diana
AU - Okon, Thomas
AU - Röhnert, Karoline
AU - Stiermaier, Thomas
AU - von Röder, Maximilian
AU - Besler, Christian
AU - Müller, Ulrike
AU - Höllriegel, Robert
AU - Schuler, Gerhard
AU - Desch, Steffen
AU - Lurz, Philipp
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Despite the ongoing debate on the role of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) in the management of therapy-resistant hypertension, little is known about its possible effects on exercise blood pressure (BP), a known predictor for future cardiovascular events. We sought to evaluate the effect of RSD on exercise BP in a randomized, sham-controlled trial in patients with mild hypertension. Methods and results: Patients with therapy-resistant mild hypertension (defined by mean daytime systolic BP between 135 and 149 mmHg or mean daytime diastolic BP between 90 and 94 mmHg on 24-h ambulatory BP measurement) were randomized to either radiofrequency-based RSD or a sham procedure. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after 6 months. Of the 71 patients randomized, data from cardiopulmonary exercise testing were available for 48 patients (22 in the RSD group, 26 in the sham group). After 6 months, patients undergoing RSD had a significantly lower systolic BP at maximum exercise workload compared to baseline (−14.2 ± 26.1 mmHg, p = 0.009). In contrast, no change was observed in the sham group (0.6 ± 22.9 mmHg, p = 0.45, p = 0.04 for between-group comparison). When analyzing patients with exaggerated baseline exercise BP only, the effect was even more pronounced (RSD vs. sham −29.5 ± 23.4 vs. 0.1 ± 25.3 mmHg, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Exercise systolic BP values in patients with mild therapy-resistant hypertension are reduced after RSD as compared to a sham-procedure.
AB - Introduction: Despite the ongoing debate on the role of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) in the management of therapy-resistant hypertension, little is known about its possible effects on exercise blood pressure (BP), a known predictor for future cardiovascular events. We sought to evaluate the effect of RSD on exercise BP in a randomized, sham-controlled trial in patients with mild hypertension. Methods and results: Patients with therapy-resistant mild hypertension (defined by mean daytime systolic BP between 135 and 149 mmHg or mean daytime diastolic BP between 90 and 94 mmHg on 24-h ambulatory BP measurement) were randomized to either radiofrequency-based RSD or a sham procedure. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after 6 months. Of the 71 patients randomized, data from cardiopulmonary exercise testing were available for 48 patients (22 in the RSD group, 26 in the sham group). After 6 months, patients undergoing RSD had a significantly lower systolic BP at maximum exercise workload compared to baseline (−14.2 ± 26.1 mmHg, p = 0.009). In contrast, no change was observed in the sham group (0.6 ± 22.9 mmHg, p = 0.45, p = 0.04 for between-group comparison). When analyzing patients with exaggerated baseline exercise BP only, the effect was even more pronounced (RSD vs. sham −29.5 ± 23.4 vs. 0.1 ± 25.3 mmHg, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Exercise systolic BP values in patients with mild therapy-resistant hypertension are reduced after RSD as compared to a sham-procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952882106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00392-015-0955-8
DO - 10.1007/s00392-015-0955-8
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 26728060
AN - SCOPUS:84952882106
SN - 1861-0684
VL - 105
SP - 592
EP - 600
JO - Clinical Research in Cardiology
JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology
IS - 7
ER -