Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Remifentanil or sufentanil for coronary surgery: Comparison of postoperative respiratory impairment

H. Guggenberger, T. H. Schroeder, R. Vonthein, H. J. Dieterich, S. K. Shernan, H. K. Eltzschig*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Background and objective: High-dose opioid anaesthesia contributes to decreasing metabolic and hormonal stress responses in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, the increase in context-sensitive half-life of opioids given as a high-dose regimen can affect postoperative respiratory recovery. In contrast, remifentanil can be given in high doses without prolonging context-sensitive half-life due to its rapid metabolism. Therefore, we performed a prospective, randomized trial to compare anaesthesia consisting of propofol/remifentanil or propofol/sufentanil with regard to postoperative respiratory function and outcome. Methods: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to a propofol/remifentanil (0.5-1.0 μg kg-1 min-1) or propofol/sufentanil (30-40 ng kg -1 min-1) based anaesthetic. Carbon dioxide response, forced expiratory volume in one second, vital capacity, and functional residual capacity were measured 1 day prior to the operation, 1 h before extubation, 1, 24 and 72 h after extubation. In addition, the incidence of atelectasis, pulmonary infiltrates, intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay were compared. Patients and physicians were blinded to the treatment group. Results: Twenty-five patients in each treatment group completed the study. There was no difference between patients of the treatment groups regarding demographics, risk- or pain scores. In all patients, carbon dioxide response, forced expiratory volume in one second, vital capacity and functional residual capacity were decreased postoperatively compared to baseline. Patients randomized to remifentanil had less depression of carbon dioxide response, less atelectasis and shorter postoperative length of stay (12 d vs. 10 d) than after sufentanil (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Intraoperative use of high-dose remifentanil for coronary artery bypass grafting may be associated with improved recovery of pulmonary function and shorter postoperative hospital length of stay than sufentanil.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology
Volume23
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)832-840
Number of pages9
ISSN0265-0215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remifentanil or sufentanil for coronary surgery: Comparison of postoperative respiratory impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this