Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows

Rolf Verleger*, Piotr Jaśkowski, Aytaç Aydemir, Rob H.J. Van Der Lubbe, Margriet Groen

*Corresponding author for this work
106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In general, both consciously and unconsciously perceived stimuli facilitate responses to following similar stimuli. However, masked arrows delay responses to following arrows. This inverse priming has been ascribed to inhibition of premature motor activation, more recently even to special processing of nonconsciously perceived material. Here, inverse priming depended on particular masks, was insensitive to contextual requirements for increased inhibition, and was constant across response speeds. Putative signs of motor inhibition in the electroencephalogram may as well reflect activation of the opposite response. Consequently, rather than profiting from inhibition of primed responses, the alternative response is directly primed by perceptual interactions of primes and masks. Thus there is no need to assume separate pathways for nonconscious and conscious processing.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume133
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)494-515
Number of pages22
ISSN0096-3445
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.12.2004

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this