Psychometric Properties of Screening Instruments for Social Network Use Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Samantha Schlossarek*, Hannah Schmidt, Anja Bischof, Gallus Bischof, Dominique Brandt, Stefan Borgwardt, Dillon T. Browne, Dimitri Christakis, Pamela Hurst-Della Pietra, Zsolt Demetrovics, Hans Jürgen Rumpf

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Importance: Children and adolescents spend considerable time on the internet, which makes them a highly vulnerable group for the development of problematic usage patterns. A variety of screening methods have already been developed and validated for social network use disorder (SNUD); however, a systematic review of SNUD in younger age groups has not been performed. Objective: To review published reports on screening tools assessing SNUD in children and adolescents with a maximum mean age of 18.9 years. Evidence Review: To identify instruments for the assessment of SNUD, a systematic literature search was conducted in the databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycArticles, and Scopus. The final search took place on May 2, 2022. Psychometric properties of available tools were examined and evaluated to derive recommendations for suitable instruments for individuals up to 18 years of age. Findings: A total of 5746 publications were identified, of which 2155 were excluded as duplicates. Of the remaining 3591 nonredundant publications, 3411 studies were assessed as not relevant after title and abstract screening. A full-text analysis of 180 remaining studies classified as potentially eligible resulted in a final inclusion of 29 studies revealing validation evidence for a total of 19 tools. The study quality was mostly moderate. With regard to validation frequency, 3 tools exhibited the largest evidence base: Social Media Disorder Scale (SMDS), the short version of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale, and Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale-Short Form (BSMAS-SF). Among these, 1 study tested a parental version (SMDS-P) for its psychometric properties. Taking all criteria into account, the strongest recommendation was made for the SMDS and BSMAS-SF. Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that the SMDS-SF and BSMAS-SF were appropriate screening measures for SNUD. Advantages of the SMDS are the availability of a short version and the possibility of an external parental rating..

Original languageEnglish
JournalJAMA Pediatrics
Volume177
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)419-426
Number of pages8
ISSN2168-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.04.2023

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 206-10 Clinical Psychiatry, Psychotherapy amd Paediatric and Juvenile Psychiatrie
  • 206-03 Experimental and Theoretical Neurosciences of Networks

Cite this