Prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake value measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose/objectives: To evaluate the prognostic impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing pretreatment [F-18] fluoro-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging. Materials/methods: Fifty-eight patients undergoing FDG PET/CT before radical treatment with definitive radiotherapy (±concomitant chemotherapy) or surgery + postoperative (chemo)radiation were analyzed. The effects of clinicopathological factors (age, gender, tumor location, stage, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and treatment strategy) including primary tumor SUV_max and nodal SUV_max on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Median follow-up for the whole population was 31 months (range 2.3–53.5). Two-year OS, LRC, DFS and DMFS, for the entire cohort were 62.1, 78.3, 55.2 and 67.2%, respectively. Median pretreatment SUV_max for the primary tumor and lymph nodes was 11.85 and 5.4, respectively. According to univariate analysis, patients with KPS < 80% (p < 0.001), AJCC stage IVa or IVb vs III (p = 0.037) and patients undergoing radiotherapy vs surgery (p = 0.042) were significantly associated with worse OS. Patients with KPS < 80% (p = 0.003) or age ≥65 years (p = 0.007) had worse LRC. The KPS < 80% was the only factor associated with decreased DFS (p = 0.001). SUV_max of the primary tumor or the lymph nodes were not associated with OS, DFS or LRC. The KPS < 80% (p = 0.002), tumor location (p = 0.047) and AJCC stage (p = 0.025) were associated with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS). According to Cox regression analysis, on multivariate analysis KPS < 80% was the only independent parameter determining worse OS, DFS, CSS. Regarding LRC only patients with IK < 80% (p = 0.01) and ≥65 years (p = 0.01) remained statistically significant. Nodal SUV_max was the only factor associated with decreased DMFS. Patients with a nodal SUV_max > 5.4 presented an increased risk for distant metastases (HR, 3.3; 95% CI 1.17–9.25; p = 0.023). Conclusions: The pretreatment nodal SUV_max in patients with locally advanced HNSCC is prognostic for DMFS. However, according to our results primary tumor SUV_max and nodal SUV_max were not significantly related to OS, DFS or LRC. Patients presenting KPS < 80% had worse OS, DFS, CSS and LRC.