TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
AU - Müller, Lukas
AU - Hahn, Felix
AU - Mähringer-Kunz, Aline
AU - Stoehr, Fabian
AU - Gairing, Simon Johannes
AU - Foerster, Friedrich
AU - Weinmann, Arndt
AU - Galle, Peter Robert
AU - Mittler, Jens
AU - Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
AU - Pitton, Michael Bernhard
AU - Düber, Christoph
AU - Fehrenbach, Uli
AU - Auer, Timo Alexander
AU - Gebauer, Bernhard
AU - Kloeckner, Roman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Background: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long-term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations. Objectives: This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Methods: This retrospective study included 349 treatment-naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well-known prognostic factors. Results: Of the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH-defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis. Conclusion: CEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone.
AB - Background: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long-term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations. Objectives: This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Methods: This retrospective study included 349 treatment-naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well-known prognostic factors. Results: Of the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH-defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis. Conclusion: CEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121345126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ueg2.12188
DO - 10.1002/ueg2.12188
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 34918471
AN - SCOPUS:85121345126
SN - 2050-6406
VL - 10
SP - 41
EP - 53
JO - United European Gastroenterology Journal
JF - United European Gastroenterology Journal
IS - 1
ER -