Abstract
The penetrance of genetic variation has been assumed to be higher at the level of neural phenotypes than at the level of behavioral phenotypes. One of the few attempts to validate this assumption is the study of Rose and Donohoe published in this issue. In this article, we will address 2 methodological issues we believe have to be considered for a better understanding of the present results. We briefly discuss potential solutions that might also help improve future meta-analyses of effect sizes in neuroimaging data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Schizophrenia Bulletin |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 501-3 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISSN | 0586-7614 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Potential bias in meta-analyses of effect sizes in imaging genetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver