Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies

Natalia Krawczyk*, Tanja Fehm, Eugen Ruckhaeberle, Laura Brus, Valeria Kopperschmidt, Achim Rody, Lars Hanker, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Patients with high-risk non-metastatic breast cancer are recommended for chemotherapy, preferably in the neoadjuvant setting. Beyond advantages such as a better operability and an improved assessment of individual prognosis, the preoperative administration of systemic treatment offers the unique possibility of selecting postoperative therapies according to tumor response. In patients with HER2-positive disease, both the escalation of therapy in the case of high-risk features and the de-escalation in patients with a low tumor load are currently discussed. Patients with small node-negative tumors receive primary surgery and, upon confirmation of pathological T1 N0 status, de-escalated adjuvant therapy with paclitaxel and trastuzumab. For those with a large tumor and/or nodal involvement, neoadjuvant polychemotherapy with a dual antibody blockade is recommended. Patients with invasive residual disease benefit from switching postoperative therapy to the antibodydrug-conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). In this review, we discuss current evidence and controversies regarding post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3002
JournalCancers
Volume14
Issue number12
ISSN2072-6694
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18.06.2022

Funding

Conflicts of Interest: Natalia Krawczyk, Laura Brus, Valeria Kopperschmidt, Achim Rody and Lars Hanker declare no conflict of interest. Maggie Banys-Paluchowski has received compensation for advisory board participation and lectures from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, pfm, Eli Lilly, Onkowissen, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Samsung, MSD, GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Sirius Pintuition, Pierre Fabre, and research support from EndoMag, Mammotome, MeritMedical. Tanja Fehm has received compensation for advisory board and lectures from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZENECA, TEVA, MSD, Daichii Sankyo Eugen Ruckhäberle has received compensation for advisory board and lectures from AMGEN, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, ASTRA Zeneca, MSD, TEVA; TESARO, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Janssen-Cilag, Clovis Oncology, Pharma Mar, GSK, Exact Sciences.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Areas and Centers

  • Research Area: Luebeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)
  • Centers: University Cancer Center Schleswig-Holstein (UCCSH)

DFG Research Classification Scheme

  • 2.22-21 Gynaecology and Obstetrics
  • 2.22-14 Hematology, Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this