TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-dural puncture headache in young adults: Comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design
AU - Gosch, U. W.
AU - Hueppe, M.
AU - Hallschmid, M.
AU - Born, J.
AU - Schmucker, P.
AU - Meier, T.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Background. To reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in continuous spinal anaesthesia, small-gauge spinal catheter systems with different techniques of dural perforation have been developed. Methods. Two systems, the catheter through-needle technique (MicroCatheter, Portex, UK) and the catheter over-needle technique (22G Spinocath®, B. Braun, Germany), were used in 18 young healthy volunteers (age 18-30 yr), who were enrolled in a neuroendocrinological investigation for analysis of neuropeptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After intermittent sampling of CSF (17×0.5 ml over 4 h), the catheter was removed and the development of PDPH and pain intensity were documented prospectively by the subjects in a standardized headache assessment (11-point numerical rating scale [NRS]). Results. The study revealed a high overall incidence of PDPH (78%) with no significant differences between groups (P=0.26). However, the over-needle group showed a significantly shorter duration of PDPH (2.4 [SD 2.3] vs 5.1 [3.1] days, P=0.050) and lower maximum pain intensity (3.1 [2.9] vs 7.3 [3.4] NRS, P=0.014) than the through-needle group. Conclusions. The results demonstrate a potential benefit of the catheter over-needle technique for the reduction of the duration and intensity of PDPH.
AB - Background. To reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in continuous spinal anaesthesia, small-gauge spinal catheter systems with different techniques of dural perforation have been developed. Methods. Two systems, the catheter through-needle technique (MicroCatheter, Portex, UK) and the catheter over-needle technique (22G Spinocath®, B. Braun, Germany), were used in 18 young healthy volunteers (age 18-30 yr), who were enrolled in a neuroendocrinological investigation for analysis of neuropeptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After intermittent sampling of CSF (17×0.5 ml over 4 h), the catheter was removed and the development of PDPH and pain intensity were documented prospectively by the subjects in a standardized headache assessment (11-point numerical rating scale [NRS]). Results. The study revealed a high overall incidence of PDPH (78%) with no significant differences between groups (P=0.26). However, the over-needle group showed a significantly shorter duration of PDPH (2.4 [SD 2.3] vs 5.1 [3.1] days, P=0.050) and lower maximum pain intensity (3.1 [2.9] vs 7.3 [3.4] NRS, P=0.014) than the through-needle group. Conclusions. The results demonstrate a potential benefit of the catheter over-needle technique for the reduction of the duration and intensity of PDPH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144424016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bja/aei100
DO - 10.1093/bja/aei100
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 15722381
AN - SCOPUS:18144424016
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 94
SP - 657
EP - 661
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -