Post-dural puncture headache in young adults: Comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design

U. W. Gosch*, M. Hueppe, M. Hallschmid, J. Born, P. Schmucker, T. Meier

*Corresponding author for this work
30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. To reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in continuous spinal anaesthesia, small-gauge spinal catheter systems with different techniques of dural perforation have been developed. Methods. Two systems, the catheter through-needle technique (MicroCatheter, Portex, UK) and the catheter over-needle technique (22G Spinocath®, B. Braun, Germany), were used in 18 young healthy volunteers (age 18-30 yr), who were enrolled in a neuroendocrinological investigation for analysis of neuropeptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After intermittent sampling of CSF (17×0.5 ml over 4 h), the catheter was removed and the development of PDPH and pain intensity were documented prospectively by the subjects in a standardized headache assessment (11-point numerical rating scale [NRS]). Results. The study revealed a high overall incidence of PDPH (78%) with no significant differences between groups (P=0.26). However, the over-needle group showed a significantly shorter duration of PDPH (2.4 [SD 2.3] vs 5.1 [3.1] days, P=0.050) and lower maximum pain intensity (3.1 [2.9] vs 7.3 [3.4] NRS, P=0.014) than the through-needle group. Conclusions. The results demonstrate a potential benefit of the catheter over-needle technique for the reduction of the duration and intensity of PDPH.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume94
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)657-661
Number of pages5
ISSN0007-0912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05.2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-dural puncture headache in young adults: Comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this