TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-approval upper airway stimulation predictors of treatment effectiveness in the ADHERE registry
AU - on behalf of the ADHERE registry investigators
AU - Heiser, Clemens
AU - Steffen, Armin
AU - Boon, Maurits
AU - Hofauer, Benedikt
AU - Doghramji, Karl
AU - Maurer, Joachim T.
AU - Ulrich Sommer, J.
AU - Soose, Ryan
AU - Strollo, Patrick J.
AU - Schwab, Richard
AU - Thaler, Erica
AU - Withrow, Kirk
AU - Kominsky, Alan
AU - Larsen, Christopher
AU - Kezirian, Eric J.
AU - Hsia, Jennifer
AU - Chia, Stanley
AU - Harwick, John
AU - Strohl, Kingman
AU - Mehra, Reena
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest: C. Heiser reports grants and personal fees from Inspire Medical Systems (Maple Grove, MN, USA), during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees for consultancy from Inspire Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. A. Steffen has received reimbursement of conference fees and travel and accommodation expenses, fees for preparing scientific continuing professional development or other events, funding for research he himself initiated, and fees for conducting clinical studies on related subjects from Inspire Medical Systems. M. Boon reports grants from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees for consultancy from Inspire Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. B. Hofauer reports personal fees from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study. K. Doghramji reports grants from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from Inspire Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. J.T. Maurer reports grants and personal fees for lectures, surgical training and consulting from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees for surgical training from Imthera and Revent, grants and personal fees for consultancy from Philipps and Nyxoah, and personal fees for lecturing from GlaxoSmithKline, Heinen und Löwenstein, Weinmann, Sissel Novacare, ResMed, Olympus, Neuwirth Medical and Medtronic, outside the submitted work. J.U. Sommer reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Inspire Medical Systems, ImThera, Regis Medical, Nyxoah, Phillips, MedEl, and personal fees from Neucomed, during the conduct of the study. R. Soose was a consultant and study investigator for Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and carried out advisory board and consultancy work for Galvani Bioelectronics, and was a consultant for Invicta Medical, outside the submitted work. P.J. Strollo Jr reports grants and personal fees for consultancy from Inspire Medical Systems and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and personal fees for consultancy from Philips-Respironics and Itamar Medical, outside the submitted work. R. Schwab reports grants from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study. E. Thaler is a consultant for Inspire Medical Systems, outside the submitted work. K. Withrow has nothing to disclose. A. Kominsky has nothing to disclose. C. Larsen has nothing to disclose. E.J. Kezirian reports grants from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and equity from Nyxoah, Pillar Palatal, Cognitive Life Science, Split Rock Scientific, Gerard Scientific, Berendo Scientific and ReVENT Medical, and grants from Autonomic Technologies, outside the submitted work; and in addition, has a patent Magnap issued, a patent Endoscopic Device and System issued, a patent Head and Neck Exercise Methods pending, and a patent Airway and Airflow Factors issued. J. Hsia has nothing to disclose. S. Chia has nothing to disclose. J. Harwick has nothing to disclose. K. Strohl reports grants (as site PI for post-approval studies) from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and was consultant to Sommetrics and advisor to Galvani Bioelectronics, outside the submitted work. R. Mehra reports grants (to institution, to support efforts to collect data for the ADHERE registry) from Inspire Medical Systems, during the conduct of the study; and grants from NIH, equipment for research from Philips Respironics and Resmed, personal fees from American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and royalties from Up to Date, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright ©ERS 2019.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Upper airway stimulation (UAS) has been shown to reduce severity of obstructive sleep apnoea. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of UAS therapy response in an international multicentre registry. Patients who underwent UAS implantation in the United States and Germany were enrolled in an observational registry. Data collected included patient characteristics, apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), objective adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction measures. Post hoc univariate and multiple logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with treatment success. Between October 2016 and January 2018, 508 participants were enrolled from 14 centres. Median AHI was reduced from 34 to 7 events·h −1 , median ESS reduced from 12 to 7 from baseline to final visit at 12-month post-implant. In post hoc analyses, for each 1-year increase in age, there was a 4% increase in odds of treatment success. For each 1-unit increase in body mass index (BMI), there was 9% reduced odds of treatment success. In the multivariable model, age persisted in serving as statistically significant predictor of treatment success. In a large multicentre international registry, UAS is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction and low adverse events. Increasing age and reduced BMI are predictors of treatment response.
AB - Upper airway stimulation (UAS) has been shown to reduce severity of obstructive sleep apnoea. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of UAS therapy response in an international multicentre registry. Patients who underwent UAS implantation in the United States and Germany were enrolled in an observational registry. Data collected included patient characteristics, apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), objective adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction measures. Post hoc univariate and multiple logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with treatment success. Between October 2016 and January 2018, 508 participants were enrolled from 14 centres. Median AHI was reduced from 34 to 7 events·h −1 , median ESS reduced from 12 to 7 from baseline to final visit at 12-month post-implant. In post hoc analyses, for each 1-year increase in age, there was a 4% increase in odds of treatment success. For each 1-unit increase in body mass index (BMI), there was 9% reduced odds of treatment success. In the multivariable model, age persisted in serving as statistically significant predictor of treatment success. In a large multicentre international registry, UAS is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction and low adverse events. Increasing age and reduced BMI are predictors of treatment response.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059493893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.01405-2018
DO - 10.1183/13993003.01405-2018
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30487205
AN - SCOPUS:85059493893
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 53
JO - European Respiratory Journal
JF - European Respiratory Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 1801405
ER -