Population-based smoking cessation in women post partum: adherence to motivational interviewing in relation to client characteristics and behavioural outcomes

Jochen René Thyrian*, Jennis Freyer-Adam, Wolfgang Hannöver, Kathrin Röske, Franziska Mentzel, Claudia Kufeld, Gallus Bischof, Hans Jürgen Rumpf, Ulrich John, Ulfert Hapke

*Corresponding author for this work
11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: quantitative description of adherence to motivational interviewing (MI) in smoking cessation sessions; and examination of the relationships between client characteristics and adherence to MI, and between adherence to MI and future smoking status. Methods: 84 sessions were conducted during a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a population-based smoking intervention in women during the postpartum period. Demographic and behaviour-related variables were included in a logistic regression to predict adherence to MI. Measurements: adherence was measured using the MI Treatment Integrity Scale. Findings: 38.1% of sessions showed good adherence to MI. Receiving a good MI session was not related to any demographic or behavioural variables. The relationship between adherence and intervention outcome after six months was not statistically significant (χ2=0.355, p=0.551). Conclusions: the smoking cessation sessions examined in this study failed to adhere to MI. There was no relationship between adherence to MI and behavioural outcome six months after the intervention, indicating that women who smoke post partum may be a high-risk group for whom specific smoking cessation interventions need to be developed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMidwifery
Volume26
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)202-210
Number of pages9
ISSN0266-6138
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2010

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Population-based smoking cessation in women post partum: adherence to motivational interviewing in relation to client characteristics and behavioural outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this