Popper and P300: Can the view ever be falsified that P3 latency is a specific indicator of stimulus evaluation?

Rolf Verleger*

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

The stimulus-evaluation hypothesis of P3 states that the latency of the P3 ERP component (also termed P300) is specifically sensitive to experimental factors that delay stimulus processing and is relatively unaffected by variables that delay response selection and execution (e.g., Duncan-Johnson and Kopell, 1981). Therefore, according to this hypothesis, P3 latency offers the means for decomposing delays encountered while producing overt stimulus-induced responses into the portion associated with stimulus evaluation and the portion associated with response production.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume121
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1371-1372
Number of pages2
ISSN1388-2457
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.08.2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research Areas and Centers

  • Academic Focus: Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Popper and P300: Can the view ever be falsified that P3 latency is a specific indicator of stimulus evaluation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this