TY - JOUR
T1 - Plasma osteopontin levels in patients with head and neck cancer and cervix cancer are critically dependent on the choice of ELISA system
AU - Vordermark, Dirk
AU - Said, Harun M.
AU - Katzer, Astrid
AU - Kuhnt, Thomas
AU - Hänsgen, Gabriele
AU - Dunst, Jürgen
AU - Flentje, Michael
AU - Bache, Matthias
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/8/15
Y1 - 2006/8/15
N2 - Background: The tumor-associated glycoprotein osteopontin (OPN) is discussed as a plasma surrogate marker of tumor hypoxia and as an indicator of the presence of pleural mesothelioma in asbestos-exposed individuals. The clinical introduction of plasma OPN measurements requires the availability of a reliable enzyme-linked immunosorbence assay (ELISA). Methods: We compared previously described and currently available ELISA systems on 88 archival plasma samples obtained from patients with head and neck or cervix cancer between 20 days before and 171 after the start of radiotherapy. Results: Median (range) plasma OPN levels were 667 (148.8-2095) ng/ml and 9.8 (3.5-189.5) ng/ ml for a previously described and a newly marketed assay, respectively. Although results for different assays were significantly correlated (r = 0.38, p < 0.05, Spearman rank test), between-assays factors ranged from 2.0 to 217.9 (median 74.6) in individual patients. OPN levels in cervix cancer patients were comparable to those of head and neck cancer patients. Conclusion: Commercially available OPN ELISA systems produce different absolute plasma OPN levels, compromising a comparison of individual patient data with published results. However, different assays appear to have a similar capacity to rank patients according to plasma OPN level. A review of literature data suggests that plasma OPN levels measured even with identical ELISA systems can only be compared with caution.
AB - Background: The tumor-associated glycoprotein osteopontin (OPN) is discussed as a plasma surrogate marker of tumor hypoxia and as an indicator of the presence of pleural mesothelioma in asbestos-exposed individuals. The clinical introduction of plasma OPN measurements requires the availability of a reliable enzyme-linked immunosorbence assay (ELISA). Methods: We compared previously described and currently available ELISA systems on 88 archival plasma samples obtained from patients with head and neck or cervix cancer between 20 days before and 171 after the start of radiotherapy. Results: Median (range) plasma OPN levels were 667 (148.8-2095) ng/ml and 9.8 (3.5-189.5) ng/ ml for a previously described and a newly marketed assay, respectively. Although results for different assays were significantly correlated (r = 0.38, p < 0.05, Spearman rank test), between-assays factors ranged from 2.0 to 217.9 (median 74.6) in individual patients. OPN levels in cervix cancer patients were comparable to those of head and neck cancer patients. Conclusion: Commercially available OPN ELISA systems produce different absolute plasma OPN levels, compromising a comparison of individual patient data with published results. However, different assays appear to have a similar capacity to rank patients according to plasma OPN level. A review of literature data suggests that plasma OPN levels measured even with identical ELISA systems can only be compared with caution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748679942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2407-6-207
DO - 10.1186/1471-2407-6-207
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 16911785
AN - SCOPUS:33748679942
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 6
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
M1 - 207
ER -