Perspective on future role of biological markers in clinical therapy trials of Alzheimer's disease: A long-range point of view beyond 2020

Harald Hampel*, Simone Lista, Stefan J. Teipel, Francesco Garaci, Robert Nisticò, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Lars Bertram, Charles Duyckaerts, Hovagim Bakardjian, Alexander Drzezga, Olivier Colliot, Stéphane Epelbaum, Karl Broich, Stéphane Lehéricy, Alexis Brice, Zaven S. Khachaturian, Paul S. Aisen, Bruno Dubois

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

Recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying various paths toward the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has begun to provide new insight for interventions to modify disease progression. The evolving knowledge gained from multidisciplinary basic research has begun to identify new concepts for treatments and distinct classes of therapeutic targets; as well as putative disease-modifying compounds that are now being tested in clinical trials. There is a mounting consensus that such disease modifying compounds and/or interventions are more likely to be effectively administered as early as possible in the cascade of pathogenic processes preceding and underlying the clinical expression of AD. The budding sentiment is that "treatments" need to be applied before various molecular mechanisms converge into an irreversible pathway leading to morphological, metabolic and functional alterations that characterize the pathophysiology of AD. In light of this, biological indicators of pathophysiological mechanisms are desired to chart and detect AD throughout the asymptomatic early molecular stages into the prodromal and early dementia phase. A major conceptual development in the clinical AD research field was the recent proposal of new diagnostic criteria, which specifically incorporate the use of biomarkers as defining criteria for preclinical stages of AD. This paradigm shift in AD definition, conceptualization, operationalization, detection and diagnosis represents novel fundamental opportunities for the modification of interventional trial designs. This perspective summarizes not only present knowledge regarding biological markers but also unresolved questions on the status of surrogate indicators for detection of the disease in asymptomatic people and diagnosis of AD.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiochemical Pharmacology
Volume88
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)426-449
Number of pages24
ISSN0006-2952
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15.04.2014

Funding

H.H. declares no competing financial interests related to the present article. During the last two years he has received lecture honoraria and/or research grants and/or travel funding and/or participated in scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant to diagnostic, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical companies involved in the manufacture and marketing of biomarkers and/or diagnostics and/or drugs or medicinal products for cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease including Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Elan Corporation, Wyeth, Novartis, Eisai Inc., Pfizer, Schwabe, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche Pharmaceuticals and Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Astra-Zeneca, Avid, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen-Cilag, Merz Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline-Biologicals, Jung-Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher Scientific Clinical Diagnostics, Cytox. He is co-inventor in pending patent submissions relating to biological markers and/or diagnostics and has not received any royalties. K.B. has served at Advisory Boards for Innogenetics, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Pfizer, and Roche. H.B. declares no conflicts of interest. He does not have any financial support from commercial companies regarding this study. A.D. declares the following potential conflicts of interest: Piramal, AVID Pharmaceuticals/Lilly, GE Healthcare, and Siemens Healthcare. O.C. declares no financial activities related to the present article. He reports having received lecture fees from Lundbeck, consulting fees from Guerbet and no other biomedical financial interests or any potential conflicts of interest. A.B. received honoraria from the Wolfson Foundation for reviewing the scientific project, and from Ludbeck for giving a talk as a speaker. He also received research support for the French Agency for Research. P.S.A. declare no competing financial interests related to the present article. He serves on a scientific advisory board for NeuroPhage; he has served as a consultant to Elan Corporation, Wyeth, Eisai Inc., Schering-Plough Corp., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, NeuroPhage, Merck & Co., Roche, Amgen, Genentech, Inc., Abbott, Pfizer Inc, Novartis, Bayer, Astellas, Dainippon, Biomarin, Solvay, Otsuka, Daiichi, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Medivation, Ichor, Toyama, Lundbeck, Biogen Idec, iPerian, Probiodrug, Somaxon, Biotie, Cardeus, Anavex, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, and Medtronic. B.D. has participated to Advisory Boards for Amivid, Eli Lilly, and Roche. His Institution has received grants from Roche and Pfizer. S.L., S.J.T., F.G., R.N., H.Z., L.B., C.D., S.E., K.Br., S.Le., and Z.S.K. declare no competing financial interests. The authors would like to thank the FRA, Fondation Pour La Recherche Sur Alzheimer, Paris, France. H.H. was supported by the Katharina-Hardt-Foundation, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany . This work was supported by the program “ Investissements d’avenir ” (Grant Number ANR-10-IAIHU-06 ). The work of O.C. is supported in part by ANR (project HM-TC, Grant Number ANR-09-EMER-006 ) and by France Alzheimer Association (project IRMA7). P.S.A. receives research support from Eli Lilly and Company and Baxter International Inc. , and the NIH [ NIA U01-AG10483 (PI), NIA U01-AG024904 (Coordinating Center Director), NIA R01-AG030048 (PI), and R01-AG16381 (Co-I)].

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspective on future role of biological markers in clinical therapy trials of Alzheimer's disease: A long-range point of view beyond 2020'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this