Personalized Clinical Decision Making Through Implementation of a Molecular Tumor Board: A German Single-Center Experience

Rouven Hoefflin, Anna-Lena Geißler, Ralph Fritsch, Rainer Claus, Julius Wehrle, Patrick Metzger, Meike Reiser, Leman Mehmed, Lisa Fauth, Dieter Henrik Heiland, Thalia Erbes, Friedrich Stock, Agnes Csanadi, Cornelius Miething, Britta Weddeling, Frank Meiss, Dagmar von Bubnoff, Christine Dierks, Isabell Ge, Volker BrassSteffen Heeg, Henning Schäfer, Martin Boeker, Justyna Rawluk, Elke Maria Botzenhart, Gian Kayser, Simone Hettmer, Hauke Busch, Christoph Peters, Martin Werner, Justus Duyster, Tilman Brummer, Melanie Boerries, Silke Lassmann, Nikolas von Bubnoff


PurposeDramatic advances in our understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of cancer, along with a rapidly expanding portfolio of molecular targeted drugs, have led to a paradigm shift toward personalized, biomarker-driven cancer treatment. Here, we report the 2-year experience of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), one of the first interdisciplinary molecular tumor conferences established in Europe. The role of the MTB is to recommend personalized therapy for patients with cancer beyond standard-of-care treatment.MethodsThis retrospective case series includes 198 patients discussed from March 2015 through February 2017. The MTB guided individual molecular diagnostics, assessed evidence of actionability of molecular alterations, and provided therapy recommendations, including approved and off-label treatments as well as available matched clinical trials.ResultsThe majority of patients had metastatic solid tumors (73.7%), mostly progressive (77.3%) after a mean of 2.0 lines of standard treatment. Diagnostic recommendations resulted in 867 molecular diagnostic tests for 172 patients (five per case), including exome analysis in 36 cases (18.2%). With a median turnaround time of 28 days, treatment recommendations were given to 104 patients (52.5%). These included single-agent targeted therapies (42.3%), checkpoint inhibitors (37.5%), and combination therapies (18.3%). Treatment recommendations were implemented in 33 of 104 patients (31.7%), of whom 19 (57.6%) showed stable disease or partial response, including 14 patients (7.1% of the entire population) receiving off-label treatments.ConclusionPersonalized extended molecular-guided patient care is effective for a small but clinically meaningful proportion of patients in challenging clinical situations. Limited access to targeted drugs, lack of trials, and submission at late disease stage prevents broader applicability, whereas genome-wide analyses are not a strict requirement for predictive molecular testing.
Original languageGerman
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 16.08.2018

Cite this