Peripheral vascular disease: Comparison of continuous MR angiography and conventional MR angiography - Pilot study

Florian M. Vogt*, Michael O. Zenge, Mark E. Ladd, Christoph U. Herborn, Katja Brauck, Wolfgang Luboldt, Jörg Barkhausen, Harald H. Quick

*Corresponding author for this work
24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for evaluation of stenosis in the peripheral arterial system with a continuous moving table technique, with conventional MR angiography as reference. This study was approved by the local institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Five healthy male volunteers (mean age, 27 years; range, 24-35 years) and four men and one woman (mean age, 63 years; range, 46-78 years) with peripheral arterial occlusive disease were examined. Images obtained with both techniques showed excellent concordance (Cohen κ = 0.75). Images obtained with a conventional protocol had higher quality compared with those obtained with the continuous technique (mean, 1.07 ± 0.25 [standard deviation] vs 1.58 ± 0.6; P < .05); small vessels appeared sharper on them. For detection of significant stenosis and occlusion, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the continuous technique were 92.8%, 100%, and 89.2%, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
JournalRadiology
Volume243
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)229-238
Number of pages10
ISSN0033-8419
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peripheral vascular disease: Comparison of continuous MR angiography and conventional MR angiography - Pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this